Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28710056›Full record

ArticleInteractive journal of medical research2017

Health-Related Coping and Social Interaction in People with Multiple Sclerosis Supported by a Social Network: Pilot Study With a New Methodological Approach.

Luigi Lavorgna, Antonio Russo, Manuela De Stefano, Roberta Lanzillo, Sabrina Esposito, Fatemeh Moshtari, Francesco Rullani, Kyrie Piscopo, Daniela Buonanno, Vincenzo Brescia Morra and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interactive journal of medical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Neurology and the Internet: a review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Concept analysis of coping with multiple sclerosis.International journal of nursing sciences · 2018
    Article
  20. Social Media and Multiple Sclerosis in the Posttruth Age.Interactive journal of medical research · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Luigi LavorgnaUniversity of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 1st Clinic of Neurology, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4625-4236
Antonio RussoUniversity of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 1st Clinic of Neurology, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6579-154X
Manuela De StefanoUniversity of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 1st Clinic of Neurology, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8012-9645
Roberta LanzilloUniversity Federico II, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6388-8180
Sabrina EspositoUniversity of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 1st Clinic of Neurology, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6750-7365
Fatemeh MoshtariFree International University for Social Studies Guido Carli, Department of Business and Management, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6346-1352
Francesco RullaniFree International University for Social Studies Guido Carli, Department of Business and Management, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6142-856X
Kyrie PiscopoUniversity Federico II, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5070-4984
Daniela BuonannoUniversity of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 1st Clinic of Neurology, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8105-4398
Vincenzo Brescia MorraUniversity Federico II, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0462-9618
Antonio GalloUniversity of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 1st Clinic of Neurology, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2203-6237
Gioacchino TedeschiUniversity of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 1st Clinic of Neurology, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3321-1125
Simona BonavitaUniversity of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 1st Clinic of Neurology, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8561-9720
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITLibera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial media are a vital link for people with health concerns who find in Web communities a valid and comforting source for information exchange, debate, and knowledge enrichment. This aspect is important for people affected by chronic diseases like multiple sclerosis (MS), who are very well informed about the disease but are vulnerable to hopes of being cured or saved by therapies whose efficacy is not always scientifically proven. To improve health-related coping and social interaction for people with MS, we created an MS social network (SMsocialnetwork.com) with a medical team constantly online to intervene promptly when false or inappropriate medical information are shared.

objectiveThe goal of this study was to assess the impact of SMsocialnetwork.com on the health-related coping and social interaction of people with MS by analyzing areas of interest through a Web-based survey.

methodsReferring to previous marketing studies analyzing the online platform's role in targeted health care, we conducted a 39-item Web-based survey. We then performed a construct validation procedure using a factorial analysis, gathering together like items of the survey related to different areas of interest such as utility, proximity, sharing, interaction, solving uncertainty, suggestion attitude, and exploration.

resultsWe collected 130 Web-based surveys. The areas of interest analysis demonstrated that the users positively evaluated SMsocialnetwork.com to obtain information, approach and solve problems, and to make decisions (utility: median 4.2); improve feeling of closeness (proximity: median 5); catalyze relationships and text general personal opinions (sharing: median 5.6); get in touch with other users to receive innovative, effective, and practical solutions (interaction, solving uncertainty, and suggestion attitude medians were respectively: 4.1, 3, and 3); and share information about innovative therapeutic approaches and treatment options (suggestion attitude: median: 3.3).

conclusionsSMsocialnetwork.com was perceived by users to be a useful tool to support health-related coping and social interaction, and may suggest a new kind of therapeutic alliance between physicians and people with MS.

Indexed as

digital healtheHealthmultiple sclerosissocial mediasocial networkWeb medicine

Identifiers

PMID28710056
PMCPMC5533941
OpenAlexW2734705965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.