Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28709924›Full record

ArticleVision research2018

Training peripheral vision to read: Boosting the speed of letter processing.

Deyue Yu, Gordon E Legge, Gunther Wagoner, Susana T L Chung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effects of home reading training on reading and quality of life in AMD-a randomized and controlled study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2019
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Deyue YuCollege of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. Electronic address: yu.858@osu.edu.
Gordon E LeggeDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Gunther WagonerDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Susana T L ChungSchool of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Funding

PSYCHOPHYSICS OF READING: NORMAL AND LOW VISIONR01EY002934 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI LEGGE, GORDON E · 1985 to 2018
$5.8M
READING IN PERIPHERAL VISIONR01EY012810 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI CHUNG, SUSANA T · 2000 to 2017
$3.8M
Efficient Assessment of Visual Deficits in Low VisionR01EY025658 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI YU, DEYUE · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY002934NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012810NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025658
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central-field loss necessitates the use of peripheral vision which makes reading slow and difficult. Slower temporal processing of letter recognition has been shown to be a limiting factor in peripheral letter recognition and reading. Previous studies showed that perceptual learning can increase the number of letters recognized on each fixation and is accompanied by an increase in reading speed. We hypothesized that improvement in temporal processing speed underlies the observed training effects. Here, we proposed an adaptive training procedure to focus on boosting the speed of letter recognition, and investigated whether peripheral reading would be enhanced by this training method. Seven normally-sighted subjects were trained with four daily one-hour sessions of a letter recognition task at 10° in the lower visual field in a pre/post design. During training, we adjusted stimulus duration on a block by block basis to maintain task difficulty near a pre-defined level of 80% performance accuracy. Stimulus duration progressively decreased with training, indicative of faster letter recognition at the 80% criterion. Following training, reading speed measured using a rapid serial visual presentation showed a substantial improvement in the trained (lower) field (41%) and the untrained (upper) field (27%), similar to the improvements observed from the training with a fixed stimulus duration. Despite being no more effective than the previous training, the adaptive temporal training method may allow individualized training, and may have advantages for clinical populations.

Indexed as

ReadingAdolescentDiscrimination LearningFemaleHumansLearningMalePattern Recognition, VisualVision, OcularVisual PerceptionYoung AdultPerceptual learningPeripheral visionReading speedTemporal processingVisual span

Identifiers

PMID28709924
PMCPMC5775067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.