Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28709920›Full record

ArticleVision research2017

Visual discomfort and flicker.

Sanae Yoshimoto, Jesel Garcia, Fang Jiang, Arnold J Wilkins, Tatsuto Takeuchi, Michael A Webster

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Visual Responsivity in Autism: Measuring Visual Responses in Autistic and Non-Autistic Adults Using Psychophysics, fMRI, and EEG.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sanae YoshimotoSchool of Psychology, Chukyo University, Showa-ku Yagotohonmachi 101-2, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8666, Japan; Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, NV 89557, USA. Electronic address: syoshimo@lets.chukyo-u.ac.jp.
Jesel GarciaDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, NV 89557, USA. Electronic address: jeselgarcia@yahoo.com.
Fang JiangDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, NV 89557, USA. Electronic address: fangj@unr.edu.
Arnold J WilkinsDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK. Electronic address: arnold@essex.ac.uk.
Tatsuto TakeuchiDepartment of Psychology, Japan Women's University, Tama-ku Nishi-ikuta 1-1-1, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 214-8565, Japan. Electronic address: takeuchi@fc.jwu.ac.jp.
Michael A WebsterDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, NV 89557, USA. Electronic address: mwebster@unr.edu.
University of Nevada, Reno · USJapan Women's University · JPUniversity of Essex · GB

Funding

SALIENCE, ADAPTATION, AND NATURAL IMAGE STATISTICSR01EY010834 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI WEBSTER, MICHAEL A · 2000 to 2023
$4.6M
Cross-modal motion responses in blind and deaf humansR00EY023268 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI JIANG, FANG · 2015 to 2017
$747k
Cross-modal motion responses in blind and deaf humansK99EY023268 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JIANG, FANG · 2013 to 2014
$191k
COLOR CONTRAST ADAPTATIONR29EY010834 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI WEBSTER, MICHAEL A · 1995 to 1999
–
NEI NIH HHS K99 EY023268NEI NIH HHS R00 EY023268NEI NIH HHS R01 EY010834NEI NIH HHS R29 EY010834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flickering lights can be uncomfortable to look at and can induce seizures in observers with photosensitive epilepsy. However, the temporal characteristics contributing to these effects are not fully known. In the spatial domain, one identified source of visual discomfort is when images have Fourier amplitude spectra that deviate from the natural (∼1/frequency, 1/f) statistical characteristics of natural scenes, especially if they contain excess energy at the medium frequencies at which the visual system is most sensitive. We tested for analogous effects in the temporal domain, manipulating both the amplitude and phase spectra of the flicker. Participants judged the relative discomfort of temporal luminance variations in a pair of uniform 17° fields with different temporal modulations. In general, discomfort increased with deviations from natural amplitude spectra, particularly those with excess energy at medium frequencies or biased toward sharper spectra. These ratings of discomfort were also consistent with ratings of how natural the modulations appeared. However, the temporal discomfort judgments were also strongly affected by the phase spectra of the flicker, with fixed vs. random spectra producing very different responses. This was not due to the perceived regularity or predictability of the flicker, but could arise from a number of other potential factors. Our findings suggest that, like spatial patterns, visual discomfort in time-varying patterns depends in part on how similar they are to the amplitude spectra of temporal variations in the natural visual environment, but also point to the critical role of the phase spectrum in the perceived discomfort of flicker.

Indexed as

Adaptation, OcularAdultFemaleHumansLightMalePerceptual DisordersVision DisordersYoung AdultAmplitude spectrumFlickerNatural image statisticsPhase spectrumTemporal frequencyVisual discomfort

Identifiers

PMID28709920
PMCPMC5703225
OpenAlexW2738873271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.