Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28709770›Full record

SynthesisSchizophrenia research2018

Meta-analysis of mismatch negativity to simple versus complex deviants in schizophrenia.

Michael Avissar, Shanghong Xie, Blair Vail, Javier Lopez-Calderon, Yuanjia Wang, Daniel C Javitt

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Schizophrenia research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Acute effects of ΔPsychopharmacology · 2022
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Reliability of mismatch negativity event-related potentials in a multisite, traveling subjects study.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael AvissarDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, United States. Electronic address: avissar@nyspi.columbia.edu.
Shanghong XieDepartment of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Blair VailDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, United States.
Javier Lopez-CalderonDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, United States.
Yuanjia WangDepartment of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Daniel C JavittDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, United States; Program in Cognitive Neuroscience and Schizophrenia, Nathan Kline Institute, Orangeburg, NY, United States.

Funding

Training in Schizophrenia and Psychotic Disorders: From Animal Models to PatientsT32MH018870 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Guillermo Horga, Christoph Kellendonk · 1988 to 2026
$9.8M
EARLY CORTICAL PROCESSING IN SCHIZOPHRENIAR01MH049334 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI JAVITT, DANIEL C. · 1998 to 2022
$8.8M
Early Cortical Processing In SchizophreniaR37MH049334 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI JAVITT, DANIEL C. · 2003 to 2012
$4.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH049334NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH049334NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH018870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mismatch negativity (MMN) deficits in schizophrenia (SCZ) have been studied extensively since the early 1990s, with the vast majority of studies using simple auditory oddball task deviants that vary in a single acoustic dimension such as pitch or duration. There has been a growing interest in using more complex deviants that violate more abstract rules to probe higher order cognitive deficits. It is still unclear how sensory processing deficits compare to and contribute to higher order cognitive dysfunction, which can be investigated with later attention-dependent auditory event-related potential (ERP) components such as a subcomponent of P300, P3b. In this meta-analysis, we compared MMN deficits in SCZ using simple deviants to more complex deviants. We also pooled studies that measured MMN and P3b in the same study sample and examined the relationship between MMN and P3b deficits within study samples. Our analysis reveals that, to date, studies using simple deviants demonstrate larger deficits than those using complex deviants, with effect sizes in the range of moderate to large. The difference in effect sizes between deviant types was reduced significantly when accounting for magnitude of MMN measured in healthy controls. P3b deficits, while large, were only modestly greater than MMN deficits (d=0.21). Taken together, our findings suggest that MMN to simple deviants may still be optimal as a biomarker for SCZ and that sensory processing dysfunction contributes significantly to MMN deficit and disease pathophysiology.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnalysis of VarianceCognition DisordersContingent Negative VariationElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHumansMalePubMedSchizophreniaComplex deviantMeta-analysisMismatch negativityP300P3bSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID28709770
PMCPMC5745291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.