Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28709587›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of physical therapy

Reference values for the bilateral heel-rise test.

Débora Pantuso Monteiro, Raquel Rodrigues Britto, Guilherme Augusto de Freitas Fregonezi, Fernando Augusto Lavezzo Dias, Marconi Gomes da Silva, Danielle Aparecida Gomes Pereira

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of physical therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03560115 (Reliability and Normative Value of Single Heel-rise Test in School-going Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03560115 completednot on this map

Reliability and Normative Value of Single Heel-rise Test in School-going Children

TypeobservationalSponsorAsir John SamuelRan2018 to 2019Enrolled500ConditionsHealthyArmsSingle-heel rise test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Smartphone Assessment of the Sitting Heel-Rise Test.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Débora Pantuso MonteiroDepartamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Raquel Rodrigues BrittoDepartamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Guilherme Augusto de Freitas FregoneziDepartamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil.
Fernando Augusto Lavezzo DiasDepartamento de Fisiologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Marconi Gomes da SilvaDepartamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Danielle Aparecida Gomes PereiraDepartamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. Electronic address: danielleufmg@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe bilateral heel-rise test is an instrument that evaluates the performance of the triceps surae. Normative parameters need to be established for the use of the heel-rise test in clinical practice.

objectiveTo determine the reference values for the bilateral heel-rise test.

methodsThis cross-sectional study assessed healthy subjects using the bilateral heel-rise test. We analyzed the number of repetitions, time (in seconds), and repetition rate (repetitions/second) during execution of the heel-rise test, until the point of voluntary fatigue. The estimates were stratified by age and gender. Multiple linear regression was performed to define the reference equation for the bilateral heel-rise test.

resultsA total of 147 individuals were included. The median age was 37 years (IQR 28-46). It was observed that the number of repetitions decreases with age, with a higher number of repetitions in male participants compared to female participants. Gender, body mass index, and maximum activity scores predict 14% of the number of plantar flexions performed in the bilateral heel-rise test. Age and adjusted activity scores predict 18% of the repetition rate in the bilateral heel-rise test.

conclusionThe bilateral heel-rise test reference values for an adult population were defined as scores above the 25th percentile for number of repetitions, time, and repetition rate. The number of heel-rise test repetitions that corresponds to the 25th percentile, according to age and gender, is as follows: age 20-29, 65 repetitions for men and 45.5 for women; age 30-39, 62.75 men and 41.5 women; age 40-49, 67.25 men and 45 women; and age 50-59, 54 men and 39.25 women.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHeelHumansMaleMuscle FatigueMuscle, SkeletalReference ValuesMuscle strengthPhysical endurancePhysical therapy

Identifiers

PMID28709587
PMCPMC5628365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.