Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28709417›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2017

Putting women at the center: a review of Indian policy to address person-centered care in maternal and newborn health, family planning and abortion.

Aradhana Srivastava, Devaki Singh, Dominic Montagu, Sanghita Bhattacharyya

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Lived experiences of women with spontaneous abortion at a district hospital, South Africa.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aradhana SrivastavaPublic Health Foundation of India, Plot no. 47, Sector 44 Institutional Area, Gurgaon, Haryana, 122002, India. aradhana@phfi.org.ORCID 0000-0001-6122-9560
Devaki SinghPublic Health Foundation of India, Plot no. 47, Sector 44 Institutional Area, Gurgaon, Haryana, 122002, India.
Dominic MontaguUniversity of California, San Francisco, USA.
Sanghita BhattacharyyaPublic Health Foundation of India, Plot no. 47, Sector 44 Institutional Area, Gurgaon, Haryana, 122002, India.
Public Health Foundation of India · INUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerson-centered care is a critical component of quality care, essential to enable treatment adherence, and maximize health outcomes. Improving the quality of health services is a key strategy to achieve the new global target of zero preventable maternal deaths by 2030. Recognizing this, the Government of India has in the last decade initiated a number of strategies to address quality of care in health and family welfare services.

methodsWe conducted a policy review of quality improvement strategies in India from 2005 to 15, covering three critical areas- maternal and newborn health, family planning, and abortion (MNHFP + A). Based on Walt and Gilson's policy triangle framework, we analyzed the extent to which policies incorporated person-centered care, while identifying unaddressed issues. Data was sourced from Government of India websites, scientific and grey literature databases.

resultsTwenty-two national policy documents, comprising two policy statements and 20 implementation guidelines of specific schemes were included in the review. Quality improvement strategies span infrastructure, commodities, human resources, competencies, and accountability that are driving quality assurance in MNHFP + A services. However, several implementation challenges have affected compliance with person-centered care, thereby affecting utilization and outcomes.

conclusionFocus on person-centered care in Indian MNHFP + A policy has increased in recent years. Nevertheless, some aspects must still be strengthened, such as positive interpersonal behavior, information sharing and promptness of care. Implementation can be improved through better provider training, patient feedback and monitoring mechanisms. Moreover, unless persisting structural challenges are addressed implementation of person-centered care in facilities will not be effective.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedFamily Planning ServicesHealth PolicyMaternal-Child Health ServicesPatient-Centered CareQuality of Health CareFemaleHealth PlanningHumansIndiaInfant HealthInfant, NewbornMaternal HealthPregnancyQuality ImprovementAbortionFamily planningIndiaMaternal and newborn healthPerson-centered carePolicyQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID28709417
PMCPMC5513115
OpenAlexW2735142795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.