Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28709013›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies2017

Association of nurse work environment and safety climate on patient mortality: A cross-sectional study.

Danielle M Olds, Linda H Aiken, Jeannie P Cimiotti, Eileen T Lake

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patient Safety Culture in Latin American Hospitals: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Danielle M OldsUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, School of Nursing, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Mail Stop 4043, Kansas City, KS 66160 913-588-0426, United States. Electronic address: danielle.m.olds@gmail.com.
Linda H AikenCenter for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, The Claire M. Fagin Leadership Professor of Nursing, Professor of Sociology, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, United States. Electronic address: laiken@nursing.upenn.edu.
Jeannie P CimiottiFlorida Blue Center for Health Care Quality, Associate Professor and Dorothy M. Smith Endowed Chair, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States. Electronic address: jcimiotti@ufl.edu.
Eileen T LakeCenter for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, Jessie M. Scott Endowed Term Associate Professor in Nursing and Health Policy, Associate Professor of Sociology, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, United States. Electronic address: elake@nursing.upenn.edu.

Funding

ADVANCED TRAINING IN NURSING OUTCOMES RESEARCHT32NR007104 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JACQUELINE MARGO BROOKS CARTHON, EILEEN T LAKE · 1999 to 2026
$11.6M
The Impact of Changes in Nursing Systems and Models of Care on Patient Outcomes: A Panel StudyR01NR014855 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Matthew D. McHugh · 2014 to 2026
$7.5M
Outcomes of Nurse Practice EnvironmentsR01NR004513 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI AIKEN, LINDA H · 1997 to 2012
$5.9M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR004513NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014855NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are two largely distinct research literatures on the association of the nurse work environment and the safety climate on patient outcomes.

objectiveTo determine whether hospital safety climate and work environment make comparable or distinct contributions to patient mortality.

designCross-sectional secondary analysis of linked datasets of Registered Nurse survey responses, adult acute care discharge records, and hospital characteristics.

settingAcute care hospitals in California, Florida, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania.

participantsThe sample included 600 hospitals linked to 27,009 nurse survey respondents and 852,974 surgical patients.

methodsNurse survey data included assessments of the nurse work environment and hospital safety climate. The outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality. Data analyses included descriptive statistics and multivariate random intercept logistic regression.

resultsIn a fully adjusted model, a one standard deviation increase in work environment score was associated with an 8.1% decrease in the odds of mortality (OR 0.919, p<0.001). A one-standard deviation increase in safety climate score was similarly associated with a 7.7% decrease in the odds of mortality (OR 0.923, p<0.001). However, when work environment and safety climate were modeled together, the effect of the work environment remained significant, while safety climate became a non-significant predictor of mortality odds (OR 0.940, p=0.035 vs. OR 0.971, p=0.316).

conclusionsWe found that safety climate perception is not predictive of patient mortality beyond the effect of the nurse work environment. To advance hospital safety and quality and improve patient outcomes, organizational interventions should be directed toward improving nurse work environments.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityNursing Staff, HospitalPatient SafetyWorkplaceCross-Sectional StudiesHumansUnited StatesHospitalNursing StaffOrganizational cultureOutcome assessment (health care)Safety

Identifiers

PMID28709013
PMCPMC5695880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.