Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28708901›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Sex-specific enhancement of palatability-driven feeding in adolescent rats.

Andrew T Marshall, Angela T Liu, Niall P Murphy, Nigel T Maidment, Sean B Ostlund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew T MarshallDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, Center for Addiction Neuroscience, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-8138
Angela T LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, Center for Addiction Neuroscience, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America.
Niall P MurphyHatos Center, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Nigel T MaidmentHatos Center, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Sean B OstlundDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, Center for Addiction Neuroscience, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America.

Funding

Cholinergic regulation of striatal neurochemistry in cue-triggered decision-makingR01MH106972 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI OSTLUND, SEAN BJORN · 2016 to 2020
$2.5M
Neurochemical bases for changes in decision-making across the lifespanR01AG045380 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MAIDMENT, NIGEL T, MURPHY, NIALL P · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
Cocaine-Seeking and the Transfer of Behavioral ControlR01DA029035 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI OSTLUND, SEAN BJORN · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
Cafeteria diet-induced dysregulation of food seeking: neurochemical basesR01DK098709 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MAIDMENT, NIGEL T, MURPHY, NIALL P · 2014 to 2016
$1.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG045380NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029035NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK098709NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been hypothesized that brain development during adolescence perturbs reward processing in a way that may ultimately contribute to the risky decision making associated with this stage of life, particularly in young males. To investigate potential reward dysfunction during adolescence, Experiment 1 examined palatable fluid intake in rats as a function of age and sex. During a series of twice-weekly test sessions, non-food-deprived rats were given the opportunity to voluntarily consume a highly palatable sweetened condensed milk (SCM) solution. We found that adolescent male, but not female, rats exhibited a pronounced, transient increase in SCM intake (normalized by body weight) that was centered around puberty. Additionally, adult females consumed more SCM than adult males and adolescent females. Using a well-established analytical framework to parse the influences of reward palatability and satiety on the temporal structure of feeding behavior, we found that palatability-driven intake at the outset of the meal was significantly elevated in adolescent males, relative to the other groups. Furthermore, although we found that there were some group differences in the onset of satiety, they were unlikely to contribute to differences in intake. Experiment 2 confirmed that adolescent male rats exhibit elevated palatable fluid consumption, relative to adult males, even when a non-caloric saccharin solution was used as the taste stimulus, demonstrating that these results were unlikely to be related to age-related differences in metabolic need. These findings suggest that elevated palatable food intake during adolescence is sex specific and driven by a fundamental change in reward processing. As adolescent risk taking has been hypothesized as a potential result of hypersensitivity to and overvaluation of appetitive stimuli, individual differences in reward palatability may factor into individual differences in adolescent risky decision making.

Indexed as

EatingAgingAnimalsBody WeightFeeding BehaviorFemaleMaleRatsRats, Long-EvansSexual MaturationSweetening AgentsTasteSweetening Agents

Identifiers

PMID28708901
PMCPMC5510835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.