ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2017
Effects of Image Quality on the Fundamental Limits of Image Registration Accuracy.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accuracy and reliability of an augmented reality prototype for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a preclinical study with 3D-printed kidney phantoms (UroCCR 168).Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Context-specific image quality assessment for virtual histologic staining: checklist and guideline.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2026Article
- Surgical Process Modeling of Workflow and Performance in Image-Guided Bronchoscopy.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Statistical Surgical Process Modeling: Analysis of Workflow and Performance of Emerging Technologies in Image-Guided Spine Surgery.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Grey matter volume and fractional anisotropy as biomarkers of cognitive change in traumatic brain injury over a 6-month period.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Registration-based biomarkers for neoadjuvant treatment response of pancreatic cancer via longitudinal image registration.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- Factors influencing the accuracy of multimodal image fusion for oral and maxillofacial tumors: a retrospective study.BMC oral health · 2022Article
- Learning-based deformable image registration: effect of statistical mismatch between train and test images.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2019Article
- A Statistical Model for Rigid Image Registration Performance: The Influence of Soft-Tissue Deformation as a Confounding Noise Source.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2019Article
- ESTIMATING DIFFEOMORPHIC MAPPINGS BETWEEN TEMPLATES AND NOISY DATA: VARIANCE BOUNDS ON THE ESTIMATED CANONICAL VOLUME FORM.Quarterly of applied mathematics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For image-guided procedures, the imaging task is often tied to the registration of intraoperative and preoperative images to a common coordinate system. While the accuracy of this registration is a vital factor in system performance, there is a relatively little work that relates registration accuracy to image quality factors, such as dose, noise, and spatial resolution. To create a theoretical model for such a relationship, we present a Fisher information approach to analyze registration performance in explicit dependence on the underlying image quality factors of image noise, spatial resolution, and signal power spectrum. The model yields analysis of the Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB), in registration accuracy as a function of factors governing image quality. Experiments were performed in simulation of computed tomography low-contrast soft tissue images and high-contrast bone (head and neck) images to compare the measured accuracy [root mean squared error (RMSE) of the estimated transformations] with the theoretical lower bound. Analysis of the CRLB reveals that registration performance is closely related to the signal-to-noise ratio of the cross-correlation space. While the lower bound is optimistic, it exhibits consistent trends with experimental findings and yields a method for comparing the performance of various registration methods and similarity metrics. Further analysis validated a method for determining optimal post-processing (image filtering) for registration. Two figures of merit (CRLB and RMSE) are presented that unify models of image quality with registration performance, providing an important guide to optimizing intraoperative imaging with respect to the task of registration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.