Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28708080›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2017

Phenoliner: A New Field Phenotyping Platform for Grapevine Research.

Anna Kicherer, Katja Herzog, Nele Bendel, Hans-Christian Klück, Andreas Backhaus, Markus Wieland, Johann Christian Rose, Lasse Klingbeil, Thomas Läbe, Christian Hohl and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Anna KichererJulius Kühn-Institut, Federal Research Centre of Cultivated Plants, Institute for Grapevine Breeding Geilweilerhof, 76833 Siebeldingen, Germany. anna.kicherer@julius-kuehn.de.
Katja HerzogJulius Kühn-Institut, Federal Research Centre of Cultivated Plants, Institute for Grapevine Breeding Geilweilerhof, 76833 Siebeldingen, Germany. katja.herzog@julius-kuehn.de.
Nele BendelJulius Kühn-Institut, Federal Research Centre of Cultivated Plants, Institute for Grapevine Breeding Geilweilerhof, 76833 Siebeldingen, Germany. nele.bendel@julius-kuehn.de.
Hans-Christian KlückFraunhofer Institute for Factory Operation and Automation (IFF), Biosystems Engineering, Sandtorstr. 22, 39108 Magdeburg, Germany. hans-christian.klueck@iff.fraunhofer.de.
Andreas BackhausFraunhofer Institute for Factory Operation and Automation (IFF), Biosystems Engineering, Sandtorstr. 22, 39108 Magdeburg, Germany. andreas.backhaus@iff.fraunhofer.de.
Markus WielandInstitute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, Department of Geodesy, University of Bonn, Nussallee 17, 53115 Bonn, Germany. wieland@igg.uni-bonn.de.
Johann Christian RoseInstitute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, Department of Geodesy, University of Bonn, Nussallee 17, 53115 Bonn, Germany. rose@igg.uni-bonn.de.
Lasse KlingbeilInstitute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, Department of Geodesy, University of Bonn, Nussallee 17, 53115 Bonn, Germany. klingbeil@igg.uni-bonn.de.
Thomas LäbeInstitute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, Department of Photogrammetry, University of Bonn, Nussallee 15, 53115 Bonn, Germany. laebe@ipb.uni-bonn.de.
Christian HohlERO-Gerätebau GmbH, Simmerner Str. 20,55469 Niederkumbd, Germany. chohl@ERO-Weinbau.de.
Willi PetryERO-Gerätebau GmbH, Simmerner Str. 20,55469 Niederkumbd, Germany. wpetry@ERO-Weinbau.de.
Heiner KuhlmannInstitute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, Department of Geodesy, University of Bonn, Nussallee 17, 53115 Bonn, Germany. heiner.kuhlmann@uni-bonn.de.
Udo SeiffertFraunhofer Institute for Factory Operation and Automation (IFF), Biosystems Engineering, Sandtorstr. 22, 39108 Magdeburg, Germany. udo.seiffert@iff.fraunhofer.de.
Reinhard TöpferJulius Kühn-Institut, Federal Research Centre of Cultivated Plants, Institute for Grapevine Breeding Geilweilerhof, 76833 Siebeldingen, Germany. reinhard.toepfer@julius-kuehn.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In grapevine research the acquisition of phenotypic data is largely restricted to the field due to its perennial nature and size. The methodologies used to assess morphological traits and phenology are mainly limited to visual scoring. Some measurements for biotic and abiotic stress, as well as for quality assessments, are done by invasive measures. The new evolving sensor technologies provide the opportunity to perform non-destructive evaluations of phenotypic traits using different field phenotyping platforms. One of the biggest technical challenges for field phenotyping of grapevines are the varying light conditions and the background. In the present study the Phenoliner is presented, which represents a novel type of a robust field phenotyping platform. The vehicle is based on a grape harvester following the concept of a moveable tunnel. The tunnel it is equipped with different sensor systems (RGB and NIR camera system, hyperspectral camera, RTK-GPS, orientation sensor) and an artificial broadband light source. It is independent from external light conditions and in combination with artificial background, the Phenoliner enables standardised acquisition of high-quality, geo-referenced sensor data.

Indexed as

VitisPhenotypebig datageo-informationgrapevine breedingplant phenotypingVitis vinifera

Identifiers

PMID28708080
PMCPMC5539483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.