Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28708060›Full record

ArticleeLife2017

SynEM, automated synapse detection for connectomics.

Benedikt Staffler, Manuel Berning, Kevin M Boergens, Anjali Gour, Patrick van der Smagt, Moritz Helmstaedter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CAVE: Connectome Annotation Versioning Engine.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Two Stream Active Query Suggestion for Active Learning in Connectomics.Computer vision - ECCV ... : ... European Conference on Computer Vision : proceedings. European Conference on Computer Vision · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benedikt StafflerDepartment of Connectomics, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7383-305X
Manuel BerningDepartment of Connectomics, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3679-8363
Kevin M BoergensDepartment of Connectomics, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt, Germany.
Anjali GourDepartment of Connectomics, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt, Germany.
Patrick van der SmagtBiomimetic Robotics and Machine Learning, Munich, Germany.
Moritz HelmstaedterDepartment of Connectomics, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7973-0767
Max Planck Institute for Brain Research · DEData:Lab Munich (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nerve tissue contains a high density of chemical synapses, about 1 per µm

Indexed as

AnimalsAutomation, LaboratoryConnectomeImaging, Three-DimensionalMiceMicroscopy, ElectronSomatosensory CortexSynapsescerebral cortexconnectomicselectron microscopymachine learningmouseneurosciencesynapses

Identifiers

PMID28708060
PMCPMC5658066
OpenAlexW2581591112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.