Review3 Biotech2017
Microalgal cultivation for value-added products: a critical enviro-economical assessment.
Review in 3 Biotech, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microalgae toxins in food products and impact on human health: a review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Overview and Challenges of Large-Scale Cultivation of Photosynthetic Microalgae and Cyanobacteria.Marine drugs · 2023Review
- Edible microalgae: potential candidate for developing edible vaccines.Vegetos (Bareilly, India) · 2023Review
- Elucidation of the Potential Hair Growth-Promoting Effect ofBiomedicines · 2022Article
- HPLC-PDA-MS/MS as a strategy to characterize and quantify natural pigments from microalgae.Current research in food science · 2020Article
- Continuous Microalgal Cultivation for Antioxidants Production.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Enhancing Sustainability by Improving Plant Salt Tolerance through Macro- and Micro-Algal Biostimulants.Biology · 2020Review
- Temperature dependent morphological changes on algal growth and cell surface with dairy industry wastewater: an experimental investigation.3 Biotech · 2020Article
- Protective Action ofMarine drugs · 2019Article
- Biodelignification and hydrolysis of rice straw by novel bacteria isolated from wood feeding termite.3 Biotech · 2018Article
- Optimization of nutrient stress using3 Biotech · 2018Article
- Production of gellan gum, an exopolysaccharide, from biodiesel-derived waste glycerol by3 Biotech · 2018Article
- Imidazolium Based Ionic Liquids: A Promising Green Solvent for Water Hyacinth Biomass Deconstruction.Frontiers in chemistry · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present review focuses on the cultivation of algal biomass for generating value-added products (VAP) and to assess their economic benefits and harmful environmental impact. Additionally, the impact of bioreactor designs on the yield of microalgal biomass for VAP is also considered. All these factors are discussed in relation to the impact of microalgae production on the bio-economy sector of commercial biotechnology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.