Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28707169›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2018

Living with a peripherally inserted central catheter: the perspective of cancer outpatients-a qualitative study.

Paula Parás-Bravo, María Paz-Zulueta, Miguel Santibañez, Cesar Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, Manuel Herrero-Montes, Vanesa Caso-Álvarez, Domingo Palacios-Ceña

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Adult oncology patients' experiences of living with a central venous catheter: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Management of Venous Access Port to Overcome Kinesiophobia of Patients with Malignant Tumors: A Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Kinesiophobia and related factors in cancer patients with TIAPs during the long term: a cross-sectional survey.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paula Parás-BravoDepartment of Nursing, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain. paula.paras@unican.es.ORCID 0000-0001-7745-3006
María Paz-ZuluetaDepartment of Nursing, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain.
Miguel SantibañezDepartment of Nursing, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain.
Cesar Fernández-de-Las-PeñasDepartment of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Rey Juan Carlos University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel Herrero-MontesCantabria Health Service, Cantabria, Spain.
Vanesa Caso-ÁlvarezCantabria Health Service, Cantabria, Spain.
Domingo Palacios-CeñaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Rey Juan Carlos University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to describe the experience of using a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in cancer sufferers receiving outpatient treatment.

methodsA qualitative, phenomenological study was performed. Purposeful sampling methods were used. Data collection methods included semi-structured interviews and researcher field notes. Thematic analysis was used to analyze data. The study was conducted following the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines.

resultsEighteen patients (61% women, mean age 58 years) participated. They spent a mean duration of 155 days with the line in place. Two themes were identified with different subgroups. The theme "Living with a PICC line," including the subthemes "Benefits" and "Disadvantages," displays how the implantation is experienced by patients in a dichotomous manner. This highlighted both the beneficial and negative aspects of the implantation. The second theme was "Adapting to life with the catheter" and comprised three subthemes: "Advantages," "Lifestyle modifications," and "Overall assessment of the peripherally inserted central catheter," which shows how patients gradually accept the catheter by adapting their lifestyle.

conclusionsOver time, most patients considered having a PICC line to be a positive experience that they would recommend to other patients, as they found that it did not alter their quality of life. These results can be applied in Oncology Units for developing specific protocols for patients.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdultAgedAmbulatory CareAntineoplastic AgentsCatheterization, Central VenousCatheterization, PeripheralFemaleHumansLife StyleMaleMedical OncologyMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOutpatientsQualitative ResearchAntineoplastic AgentsCathetersCentral venous cathetersMedical oncologyPatientsQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID28707169
PMCPMC5752737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.