ReviewDer Orthopade2017
[Synthetic bone replacement : Current developments and perspectives].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Tricalcium Phosphate on Healing of Non-Unions: An Observational Study of over 400 Non-Unions.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2023Article
- Multimodal porogen platforms for calcium phosphate cement degradation.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2019Article
- [Bone substitute materials as local drug carriers : Current status of substitutes of various origins].Der Orthopade · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Successful reconstruction of critical bone defects requires complete elimination of the underlying pathology, preservation or restoration of mechanical stability of the affected bone segment and, most importantly, an adequate filling material that supports the regeneration and formation of new bone within the treated defect in an optimal fashion. Currently available synthetic bone graft substitutes cannot address all requirements of such a complex biological process individually. Due their suboptimal and, with respect to physiological bone healing, asynchronous biodegradation properties, their specific foreign material-mediated side effects and complications and fairly modest overall osteogenic potential, their overall clinical performance typically lags behind conventional bone grafts. However, a defect and pathology specific combination of synthetic bone graft substitutes with appropriate carrier properties, therapeutic agents and/or conventional bone graft materials allows the creation of biologically enhanced composite constructs that can surpass the biological and therapeutic limits of autologous bone grafts. This monograph presents a new concept based on the biological enhancement of optimal therapeutic agent-carrier composites and provides a rationale for an individual, requirement-specific adaptation of a truly patient-specific bone defect reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28707134What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.