Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28707130›Full record

SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2017

Safety and efficacy of Cerebrolysin in motor function recovery after stroke: a meta-analysis of the CARS trials.

Alla Guekht, Johannes Vester, Wolf-Dieter Heiss, Eugene Gusev, Volker Hoemberg, Volker W Rahlfs, Ovidiu Bajenaru, Bogdan O Popescu, Edith Doppler, Stefan Winter and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06489925 (Cerebrolysin as an Add-On Therapy to Standard Treatment of Posterior Circulation Stroke Secondary to Basilar Artery Occlusion), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06489925 early_phase1unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Cerebrolysin as an Add-On Therapy to Standard Treatment of Posterior Circulation Stroke Secondary to Basilar Artery Occlusion

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital Sestre MilosrdniceRan2024 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsBasilar Artery Occlusion, Posterior Circulation Brain InfarctionArmsCerebrolysin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cerebrolysin for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Safety and efficacy of Cerebrolysin in early post-stroke recovery: a meta-analysis of nine randomized clinical trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. C-REGS2-A multinational, high-quality comparative effectiveness study of Cerebrolysin in moderate acute ischemic stroke.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Reversing the Ruin: Rehabilitation, Recovery, and Restoration After Stroke.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Alla GuekhtMoscow Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry and Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Johannes VesterDepartment of Biometry and Clinical Research, IDV Data Analysis and Study Planning, Krailling, Germany.
Wolf-Dieter HeissMax Planck Institute for Metabolism Research, Cologne, Germany.
Eugene GusevDepartment of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Volker HoembergDepartment of Neurology, SHR Gesundheitszentrum Bad Wimpfen GmbH, Bad Wimpfen, Germany.
Volker W RahlfsDepartment of Biometry and Clinical Research, IDV Data Analysis and Study Planning, Krailling, Germany.
Ovidiu BajenaruDepartment of Neurology, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Bogdan O PopescuDepartment of Neurology, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Edith DopplerDepartment of Clinical Research, EVER Neuro Pharma GmbH, Unterach, Austria.
Stefan WinterDepartment of Clinical Research, EVER Neuro Pharma GmbH, Unterach, Austria.
Herbert MoesslerCOMAMO LifeSciences GmbH, Mondsee, Austria.
Dafin MuresanuDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Victor Babes Street No. 8, 400012, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. dafinm@ssnn.ro.
EVER Neuro Pharma (Austria) · ATZimmer Biomet (Germany) · DECarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROInstitutul National Victor Babes · ROIuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROMax Planck Institute for Metabolism Research · DEMoscow Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry · RUPHV Dialysezentrum · DEPirogov Russian National Research Medical University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This meta-analysis combines the results of two identical stroke studies (CARS-1 and CARS-2) assessing efficacy of Cerebrolysin on motor recovery during early rehabilitation. Cerebrolysin is a parenterally administered neuropeptide preparation approved for the treatment of stroke. Both studies had a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Treatment with 30 ml Cerebrolysin once daily for 3 weeks was started 24-72 h after stroke onset. In addition, patients participated in a standardized rehabilitation program for 21 days that was initiated within 72 h after stroke onset. For both studies, the original analysis data were used for meta-analysis (individual patient data analysis). The combination of these two studies by meta-analytic procedures was pre-planned, and the methods were pre-defined under blinded conditions. The nonparametric Mann-Whitney (MW) effect size of the two studies on the ARAT score on day 90 indicated superiority of Cerebrolysin compared with placebo (MW 0.62, P < 0.0001, Wei-Lachin pooling procedure, day 90, last observation carried forward; N = 442). Also, analysis of early benefit at day 14 and day 21 by means of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, which is regarded as most sensitive to early improvements, showed statistical significance (MW 0.59, P < 0.002). The corresponding number-needed-to-treat (NNT) for clinically relevant changes in early NIHSS was 7.1 (95% CI: 4 to 22). Cerebrolysin had a beneficial effect on motor function and neurological status in early rehabilitation patients after acute ischemic stroke. Safety aspects were comparable to placebo, showing a favourable benefit/risk ratio.

Indexed as

Stroke RehabilitationAmino AcidsHumansMotor ActivityNeuroprotective AgentsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionStrokeAmino AcidscerebrolysinNeuroprotective AgentsCerebrolysinEarly benefitMeta-analysisNIHSSRecoveryStroke

Identifiers

PMID28707130
PMCPMC5605586
OpenAlexW2736082942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.