ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2017
[Traumatized relatives of intensive care patients].
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Psychological care in German intensive care units : Results of a survey among the members of the German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2021Article
- [Psychotraumatological aspects in intensive care medicine].Der Nervenarzt · 2021Article
- Quality improvement of end‑of‑life decision-making and communication in the ICU : Effect on clinicians' burnout and relatives' distress.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2020Article
- [Psychotraumatological aspects in intensive care medicine].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2020Article
- [Psychological care in the intensive care unit : Task areas, responsibilities, requirements, and infrastructure].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2020Review
- Need for psychological support in intensive care : A survey among members of the German Society of Medical Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2020Article
- Recommendations for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR): consensus statement of DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI and GRC.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2019Review
- [Recommendations for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) : Consensus statement of DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI and GRC].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2018Article
- [Recommendations for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) : Consensus statement of DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI and GRC].Der Anaesthesist · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Relatives are not only visitors in the intensive care unit, but provide support and care for patients at the end of life, and serve as an important source of information for clinicians. They are confronted, often unexpectedly and unprepared, with life-threatening illness, death and dying and life-threatening decisions to limit therapy. Thus, they are often substantially burdened themselves and are in need of support. It is undisputed that communication with relatives can have an adaptive or also traumatic influence on the experience gained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.