Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28706755›Full record

ArticleDentistry (Sunnyvale, Calif.)2017

Effects of a Novel Whitening Formulation on Dental Enamel.

Thair Takesh, Anik Sargsyan, Afarin Anbarani, Jessica Ho, Petra Wilder-Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dentistry (Sunnyvale, Calif.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thair TakeshBeckman Laser Institute, University of California, Irvine CA 92617.
Anik SargsyanBeckman Laser Institute, University of California, Irvine CA 92617.
Afarin AnbaraniBeckman Laser Institute, University of California, Irvine CA 92617.
Jessica HoBeckman Laser Institute, University of California, Irvine CA 92617.
Petra Wilder-SmithBeckman Laser Institute, University of California, Irvine CA 92617.

Funding

WOUND MIGRATION FORCE MONITORINGP41RR001192 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LYUBOVITSKY, JULIA · 1985 to 2011
$14.2M
Virtual Photonocs TechnologiesP41EB015890 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI DURKIN, ANTHONY J · 2012 to 2017
$7.0M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR001192NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015890
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe goal of this study was to evaluate the enamel whitening effects of 2 new test formulations, one of which was a rinse, and the other a whitening strip. MATERIALS AND

methodsForty enamel chips were prepared from 20 healthy extracted teeth (2 from each tooth). After pre-staining and colorimetry to measure L* and b* values, 20 matched samples were immersed in either test or control rinses, and then colorimetry was performed again after 1 hr, 2 hr, 3 hr, 6 hr, 12 hr, 24 hr and 48 hrs (Each hour equates to one month of clinical use at the recommended dosage of 1 minute exposure 2 times a day). The remaining 20 matched samples were exposed to the test or control whitening strips and colorimetry was performed every 30 minutes for a total of 10 treatments.

resultsOverall, the whitening performance of test and control strips was similar. The test and control rinses had a similar lightening effect over the first 3 hours (equivalent to 3 months of clinical use). Subsequently, the control rinse continued to lighten samples, whereas the test rinse had little further effect.

conclusionTest and control-whitening strips showed similar effects; over time whitening strips showed a greater lightening effect than whitening rinses.

Indexed as

BleachingBleaching stripsColorimetryEnamelMouth rinseWhitening

Identifiers

PMID28706755
PMCPMC5505690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.