ArticleScientific reports2017
Comprehensive Multi-Dimensional MRI for the Simultaneous Assessment of Cardiopulmonary Anatomy and Physiology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Motion Mitigation Techniques for Abdominal and Cardiac MR Imaging.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Review
- Highly accelerated 4D flow MRI with respiratory compensation and cardiac view sharing: a cross-sectional study of flow in the great vessels of pediatric congenital heart disease.Pediatric radiology · 2025Article
- Ferumoxytol-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: applications and technical advances.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025Review
- Alternating low-rank tensor reconstruction for improved multiparametric mapping with cardiovascular MR Multitasking.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Movienet: Deep space-time-coil reconstruction network without k-space data consistency for fast motion-resolved 4D MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- 4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement: 2023 update.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023Review
- Focused navigation for respiratory-motion-corrected free-running radial 4D flow MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Free-breathing myocardial TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Latest Advances in Image Acceleration: All Dimensions are Fair Game.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023Review
- Ferumoxytol-enhanced 4D multiphase, steady-state imaging with magnetic resonance in congenital heart disease: ventricular volume and function across 2D and 3D software platforms.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- Improved diffusion parameter estimation by incorporating TNeuroImage · 2022Article
- Pilot tone navigation for respiratory and cardiac motion-resolved free-running 5D flow MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- Simultaneous multi-parametric acquisition and reconstruction techniques in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: Basic concepts and status of clinical development.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Fast Real-Time Cardiac MRI: a Review of Current Techniques and Future Directions.Investigative magnetic resonance imaging · 2021Article
- Retrospective Camera-Based Respiratory Gating in Clinical Whole-Heart 4D Flow MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2021Article
- Using 5D flow MRI to decode the effects of rhythm on left atrial 3D flow dynamics in patients with atrial fibrillation.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- Fully self-gated whole-heart 4D flow imaging from a 5-minute scan.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Quantification of Structure-Function Relationships in Heart Failure.Heart failure clinics · 2021Review
- Extreme MRI: Large-scale volumetric dynamic imaging from continuous non-gated acquisitions.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2020Article
- Pseudo-spiral sampling and compressed sensing reconstruction provides flexibility of temporal resolution in accelerated aortic 4D flow MRI: A comparison with k-t principal component analysis.NMR in biomedicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Diagnostic testing often assesses the cardiovascular or respiratory systems in isolation, ignoring the major pathophysiologic interactions between the systems in many diseases. When both systems are assessed currently, multiple modalities are utilized in costly fashion with burdensome logistics and decreased accessibility. Thus, we have developed a new acquisition and reconstruction paradigm using the flexibility of MRI to enable a comprehensive exam from a single 5-15 min scan. We constructed a compressive-sensing approach to pseudo-randomly acquire highly subsampled, multi-dimensionally-encoded and time-stamped data from which we reconstruct volumetric cardiac and respiratory motion phases, contrast-agent dynamics, and blood flow velocity fields. The proposed method, named XD flow, is demonstrated for (a) evaluating congenital heart disease, where the impact of bulk motion is reduced in a non-sedated neonatal patient and (b) where the observation of the impact of respiration on flow is necessary for diagnostics; (c) cardiopulmonary imaging, where cardiovascular flow, function, and anatomy information is needed along with pulmonary perfusion quantification; and in (d) renal function imaging, where blood velocities and glomerular filtration rates are simultaneously measured, which highlights the generality of the technique. XD flow has the ability to improve quantification and to provide additional data for patient diagnosis for comprehensive evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.