Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28706098›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Changes in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment and control rates over 20 years in National Capital Region of India: results from a repeat cross-sectional study.

Ambuj Roy, Pradeep A Praveen, Ritvik Amarchand, Lakshmy Ramakrishnan, Ruby Gupta, Dimple Kondal, Kalpana Singh, Meenakshi Sharma, Deepak Kumar Shukla, Nikhil Tandon and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Temporal trends in adherence to lifestyle recommendations of patients with hypertension in Korea, 2007-2021.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ambuj RoyDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiothoracic Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Pradeep A PraveenDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ritvik AmarchandCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Lakshmy RamakrishnanDepartment of Cardiac Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ruby GuptaPublic Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, India.
Dimple KondalPublic Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, India.
Kalpana SinghPublic Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, India.
Meenakshi SharmaIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Deepak Kumar ShuklaIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Nikhil TandonDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Kolli Srinath ReddyPublic Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, India.
Anand KrishnanCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Dorairaj PrabhakaranPublic Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesDespite being one of the leading risk factors of cardiovascular mortality, there are limited data on changes in hypertension burden and management from India. This study evaluates trend in the prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in the urban and rural areas of India's National Capital Region (NCR). DESIGN AND

settingTwo representative cross-sectional surveys were conducted in urban and rural areas (survey 1 (1991-1994); survey 2 (2010-2012)) of NCR using similar methodologies.

participantsA total of 3048 (mean age: 46.8±9.0 years; 52.3% women) and 2052 (mean age: 46.5±8.4 years; 54.2% women) subjects of urban areas and 2487 (mean age: 46.6±8.8 years; 57.0% women) and 1917 (mean age: 46.5±8.5 years; 51.3% women) subjects of rural areas were included in survey 1 and survey 2, respectively. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Hypertension was defined as per Joint National Committee VII guidelines. Structured questionnaire was used to measure the awareness and treatment status of hypertension. A mean systolic blood pressure <140 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg was defined as control of hypertension among the participants with hypertension.

resultsThe age and sex standardised prevalence of hypertension increased from 23.0% to 42.2% (p<0.001) and 11.2% to 28.9% (p<0.001) in urban and rural NCR, respectively. In both surveys, those with high education, alcohol use, obesity and high fasting blood glucose were at a higher risk for hypertension. However, the change in hypertension prevalence between the surveys was independent of these risk factors (adjusted OR (95% CI): urban (2.3 (2.0 to 2.7)) rural (3.1 (2.4 to 4.0))). Overall, there was no improvement in awareness, treatment and control rates of hypertension in the population.

conclusionThere was marked increase in prevalence of hypertension over two decades with no improvement in management.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansHypertensionIndiaMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsRural PopulationTime FactorsCardiovascular disease risk factorsHypertensionIndiaPre-HypertensionSecular trends

Identifiers

PMID28706098
PMCPMC5734355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.