ReviewAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2017
Pacemakers in MRI for the Neuroradiologist.
Review in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- MRI-Derived Evaluation of Liver Function and Its Extension to K-Edge Photon-Counting CT: Focus on Gadolinium-Based Functional Biliary Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Low-dose CT for MRI-free quantification of tau PET in Alzheimer's disease: a multicentre, cross-sectional, comparison study.The Lancet medical imaging & theranostics · 2026Article
- MRI safety screening of children with implants: updates and challenges.Pediatric radiology · 2023Review
- MRI of Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.Current cardiovascular imaging reports · 2019Article
- Chest radiographs of cardiac devices (Part 1): Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices, cardiac valve prostheses and Amplatzer occluder devices.SA journal of radiology · 2019Article
- Determining the Etiology of Internuclear Ophthalmoplegia in a Patient with a Cardiac Pacemaker and Complex Neurological Presentation.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2018Article
- Pacemakers in MRI for the Neuroradiologist: Revisited.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2018Article
- Economic Considerations in MR Imaging of Patients with Cardiac Devices.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac implantable electronic devices are frequently encountered in clinical practice in patients being screened for MR imaging examinations. Traditionally, the presence of these devices has been considered a contraindication to undergoing MR imaging. Growing evidence suggests that most of these patients can safely undergo an MR imaging examination if certain conditions are met. This document will review the relevant cardiac implantable electronic devices encountered in practice today, the background physics/technical factors related to scanning these devices, the multidisciplinary screening protocol used at our institution for scanning patients with implantable cardiac devices, and our experience in safely performing these examinations since 2010.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.