ArticleHearing research2017
Noise-induced hearing loss induces loudness intolerance in a rat Active Sound Avoidance Paradigm (ASAP).
Article in Hearing research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Advances in Pharmacological Approaches to Tinnitus and Hyperacusis: Insights into Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Clinical Heterogeneity from an International Scientific Meeting.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- TheFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2023Article
- Article
- Embryonic medial ganglionic eminence cells survive and integrate into the inferior colliculus of adult mice.Hearing research · 2022Article
- Clinical and investigational tools for monitoring noise-induced hyperacusis.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Review
- Estimated cochlear neural degeneration is associated with loudness hypersensitivity in individuals with normal audiograms.JASA express letters · 2022Article
- Loss of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Mediates Inhibition of Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation by High-Intensity Sound.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2021Article
- Article
- Functional Neuroanatomy of Salicylate- and Noise-Induced Tinnitus and Hyperacusis.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021Article
- Occupational Noise: Auditory and Non-Auditory Consequences.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Review
- Interaction of auditory and pain pathways: Effects of stimulus intensity, hearing loss and opioid signaling.Hearing research · 2020Article
- Mechanisms underlying auditory processing deficits in Fragile X syndrome.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2020Review
- A Novel Mouse Model of Aminoglycoside-Induced Hyperacusis and Tinnitus.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Noise-Induced loudness recruitment and hyperacusis: Insufficient central gain in auditory cortex and amygdala.Neuroscience · 2019Article
- Unpleasant Sound Elicits Negative Emotion and Reinstates Drug Seeking.Molecular neurobiology · 2019Article
- Testing the Central Gain Model: Loudness Growth Correlates with Central Auditory Gain Enhancement in a Rodent Model of Hyperacusis.Neuroscience · 2019Article
- Two novel genomic regions associated with fearfulness in dogs overlap human neuropsychiatric loci.Translational psychiatry · 2019Article
- Altered Spatial and Temporal Brain Connectivity in the Salience Network of Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Tinnitus.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Cochlear Synaptopathy Changes Sound-Evoked Activity Without Changing Spontaneous Discharge in the Mouse Inferior Colliculus.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Hyperacusis is a loudness hypersensitivity disorder in which moderate-intensity sounds are perceived as extremely loud, aversive and/or painful. To assess the aversive nature of sounds, we developed an Active Sound Avoidance Paradigm (ASAP) in which rats altered their place preference in a Light/Dark shuttle box in response to sound. When no sound (NS) was present, rats spent more than 95% of the time in the Dark Box versus the transparent Light Box. However, when a 60 or 90 dB SPL noise (2-20 kHz, 2-8 kHz, or 16-20 kHz bandwidth) was presented in the Dark Box, the rats'' preference for the Dark Box significantly decreased. Percent time in the dark decreased as sound intensity in the Dark Box increased from 60 dB to 90 dB SPL. Interestingly, the magnitude of the decrease was not a monotonic function of intensity for the 16-20 kHz noise and not related to the bandwidth of the 2-20 kHz and 2-8 kHz noise bands, suggesting that sound avoidance is not solely dependent on loudness but the aversive quality of the noise as well. Afterwards, we exposed the rats for 28 days to a 16-20 kHz noise at 102 dB SPL; this exposure produced a 30-40 dB permanent threshold shift at 16 and 32 kHz. Following the noise exposure, the rats were then retested on the ASAP paradigm. High-frequency hearing loss did not alter Dark Box preference in the no-sound condition. However, when the 2-20 kHz or 2-8 kHz noise was presented at 60 or 90 dB SPL, the rats avoided the Dark Box significantly more than they did before the exposure, indicating these two noise bands with energy below the region of hearing loss were perceived as more aversive. In contrast, when the 16-20 kHz noise was presented at 60 or 90 dB SPL, the rats remained in the Dark Box presumably because the high-frequency hearing loss made 16-20 kHz noise less audible and less aversive. These results indicate that when rats develop a high-frequency hearing loss, they become less tolerant of low frequency noise, i.e., high intensity sounds are perceived as more aversive and should be avoided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.