Trial reportBMC psychiatry2017
Efficacy of prospective pharmacogenetic testing in the treatment of major depressive disorder: results of a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.
Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 93 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomised, Controlled, Parallel Clinical Trial on the Efficacy of Pharmacogenetic Information Obtained With NEUROFARMAGEN in the Treatment of Patients With Mental Disorders
The myGenes Study:Individualizing Antidepressant Treatment Using Pharmacogenomics and EHR-driven Clinical Decision Support
A Prospective Interventional Trial of Pharmacogenomic-Guided Supportive Care in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
Genetic Variations Associated With the Therapeutic Response and Profile of Adverse Effects in the Treatment of Bipolar Depression
Who cites it
93 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness of pharmacogenomic-guided versus unguided antidepressant treatment in major depressive disorder: new insights from subgroup and cumulative meta-analyses.BMJ mental health · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of pharmacogenomics testing guiding on clinical outcomes in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT.BMC psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of pharmacogenetic clinical decision support systems for the treatment of major depressive disorder.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2023Pooled it
- Pharmacokinetic Markers of Clinical Outcomes in Severe Mental Illness: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Pharmacogenomic Testing and Depressive Symptom Remission: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective, Controlled Clinical Trials.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2022Pooled it
- Multi-gene Pharmacogenomic Testing That Includes Decision-Support Tools to Guide Medication Selection for Major Depression: A Health Technology Assessment.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2021Pooled it
- Does pharmacogenetic testing optimize antidepressant effectiveness in major depressive disorder? Data from a double-blind randomized controlled trial in a real-world clinical setting.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025Trial
- Multigenetic Pharmacogenomics-Guided Treatment vs Treatment As Usual Among Hospitalized Men With Schizophrenia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Pharmacogenomics guided versus standard antidepressant treatment in a community pharmacy setting: A randomized controlled trial.Clinical and translational science · 2021Trial
- Effect of Routine Cytochrome P450 2D6 and 2C19 Genotyping on Antipsychotic Drug Persistence in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2020Trial
- Primary care and mental health providers' perceptions of implementation of pharmacogenetics testing for depression prescribing.BMC psychiatry · 2020Trial
- Patient characteristics driving clinical utility in psychiatric pharmacogenetics: a reanalysis from the AB-GEN multicentric trial.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2019Trial
- Clinical Utility of Pharmacogenetic Testing and a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Enhance the Identification of Drug Therapy Problems Through Medication Therapy Management in Polypharmacy Patients.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2018Trial
- Article
- Current progress in targeted pharmacotherapy to treat symptoms of major depressive disorder: moving from broad-spectrum treatments to precision psychiatry.CNS spectrums · 2025Review
- Impact and Enablers of Pharmacogenetic-Informed Treatment Decisions-A Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Study Exploring the Patient Perspective.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A review of real-world evidence on preemptive pharmacogenomic testing for preventing adverse drug reactions: a reality for future health care.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2024Review
- Clinical Utility and Implementation of Pharmacogenomics for the Personalisation of Antipsychotic Treatments.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- A New Intervention for Implementation of Pharmacogenetics in Psychiatry: A Description of the PSY-PGx Clinical Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA 12-week, double-blind, parallel, multi-center randomized controlled trial in 316 adult patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing for drug therapy guidance.
methodsPatients with a CGI-S ≥ 4 and requiring antidepressant medication de novo or changes in their medication regime were recruited at 18 Spanish public hospitals, genotyped with a commercial PGx panel (Neuropharmagen®), and randomized to PGx-guided treatment (n = 155) or treatment as usual (TAU, control group, n = 161), using a computer-generated random list that locked or unlocked psychiatrist access to the results of the PGx panel depending on group allocation. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a sustained response (Patient Global Impression of Improvement, PGI-I ≤ 2) within the 12-week follow-up. Patients and interviewers collecting the PGI-I ratings were blinded to group allocation. Between-group differences were evaluated using χ2-test or t-test, as per data type.
resultsTwo hundred eighty patients were available for analysis at the end of the 12-week follow-up (PGx n = 136, TAU n = 144). A difference in sustained response within the study period (primary outcome) was not observed (38.5% vs 34.4%, p = 0.4735; OR = 1.19 [95%CI 0.74-1.92]), but the PGx-guided treatment group had a higher responder rate compared to TAU at 12 weeks (47.8% vs 36.1%, p = 0.0476; OR = 1.62 [95%CI 1.00-2.61]), and this difference increased after removing subjects in the PGx-guided group when clinicians explicitly reported not to follow the test recommendations (51.3% vs 36.1%, p = 0.0135; OR = 1.86 [95%CI 1.13-3.05]). Effects were more consistent in patients with 1-3 failed drug trials. In subjects reporting side effects burden at baseline, odds of achieving a better tolerability (Frequency, Intensity and Burden of Side Effects Rating Burden subscore ≤2) were higher in the PGx-guided group than in controls at 6 weeks and maintained at 12 weeks (68.5% vs 51.4%, p = 0.0260; OR = 2.06 [95%CI 1.09-3.89]).
conclusionsPGx-guided treatment resulted in significant improvement of MDD patient's response at 12 weeks, dependent on the number of previously failed medication trials, but not on sustained response during the study period. Burden of side effects was also significantly reduced.
trial registrationEuropean Clinical Trials Database 2013-002228-18 , registration date September 16, 2013; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02529462 , retrospectively registered: August 19, 2015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.