ReviewJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2017
Sensorimotor Learning: Neurocognitive Mechanisms and Individual Differences.
Review in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Sensation to Action: Neuroplasticity, Cognitive-Motor Training, and Emerging Biomarkers of Adaptation.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Dopaminergic genetic variation and response to social comparative feedback when learning a motor sequence task.PloS one · 2026Article
- Factors influencing caster board skill acquisition.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Motor actions across psychiatric disorders: A research domain criteria (RDoC) perspective.Clinical psychology review · 2024Review
- Review
- Motor learning and performance in schizophrenia and aging: two different patterns of decline.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- EEG error-related potentials encode magnitude of errors and individual perceptual thresholds.iScience · 2023Article
- Adaptive changes in sensorimotor processing in patients with acute low back pain.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Individual sensorimotor adaptation characteristics are independent across orofacial speech movements and limb reaching movements.Journal of neurophysiology · 2022Article
- Human Variation in Error-Based and Reinforcement Motor Learning Is Associated With Entorhinal Volume.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2022Article
- Contributing Factors to Sensorimotor Adaptability in Reactive Agility Performance in Youth Athletes.Journal of human kinetics · 2022Article
- Repeated Motor Training on Attention Reaching Skills and Stereotypies in Rett Syndrome.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2022Article
- Personality and brain contribute to academic achievements of medical students.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Dynamic motor practice improves movement accuracy, force control and leads to increased corticospinal excitability compared to isometric motor practice.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Altered functional connectivity between primary motor cortex subregions and the whole brain in patients with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Altered Brain Volume, Microstructure Metrics and Functional Connectivity Features in Multiple System Atrophy.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- Individual Differences in Sensorimotor Adaptation Are Conserved Over Time and Across Force-Field Tasks.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- The acute effects of aerobic exercise on sensorimotor adaptation in chronic stroke.Restorative neurology and neuroscience · 2021Article
- Differentiation of Cerebellum-Type and Parkinson-Type of Multiple System Atrophy by Using Multimodal MRI Parameters.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Article
- Inconsistency between cortical reorganization and functional connectivity alteration in the sensorimotor cortex following incomplete cervical spinal cord injury.Brain imaging and behavior · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Here we provide an overview of findings and viewpoints on the mechanisms of sensorimotor learning presented at the 2016 Biomechanics and Neural Control of Movement (BANCOM) conference in Deer Creek, OH. This field has shown substantial growth in the past couple of decades. For example it is now well accepted that neural systems outside of primary motor pathways play a role in learning. Frontoparietal and anterior cingulate networks contribute to sensorimotor adaptation, reflecting strategic aspects of exploration and learning. Longer term training results in functional and morphological changes in primary motor and somatosensory cortices. Interestingly, re-engagement of strategic processes once a skill has become well learned may disrupt performance. Efforts to predict individual differences in learning rate have enhanced our understanding of the neural, behavioral, and genetic factors underlying skilled human performance. Access to genomic analyses has dramatically increased over the past several years. This has enhanced our understanding of cellular processes underlying the expression of human behavior, including involvement of various neurotransmitters, receptors, and enzymes. Surprisingly our field has been slow to adopt such approaches in studying neural control, although this work does require much larger sample sizes than are typically used to investigate skill learning. We advocate that individual differences approaches can lead to new insights into human sensorimotor performance. Moreover, a greater understanding of the factors underlying the wide range of performance capabilities seen across individuals can promote personalized medicine and refinement of rehabilitation strategies, which stand to be more effective than "one size fits all" treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.