Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28705166›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2017

Looking back and moving forward: can we accelerate progress on adolescent pregnancy in the Americas?

Sonja Caffe, Marina Plesons, Alma Virginia Camacho, Luisa Brumana, Shelly N Abdool, Silvia Huaynoca, Katherine Mayall, Lindsay Menard-Freeman, Luis Andres de Francisco Serpa, Rodolfo Gomez Ponce de Leon and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sonja CaffePan American Health Organization (PAHO/WHO), 525 23rd Street, NW, Washington, DC, USA. caffes@paho.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8116-0468
Marina PlesonsUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Alma Virginia CamachoUnited Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean, Panama City, Panama.
Luisa BrumanaUnited Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean, Panama City, Panama.
Shelly N AbdoolUnited Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean, Panama City, Panama.
Silvia HuaynocaInternational Planned Parenthood Federation/ Western Hemisphere Region (IPPF/WHR), New York, USA.
Katherine MayallCenter for Reproductive Rights, New York, USA.
Lindsay Menard-FreemanThe Torchlight Collective, Nashville, TN, USA.
Luis Andres de Francisco SerpaPan American Health Organization (PAHO/WHO), Washington, DC, USA.
Rodolfo Gomez Ponce de LeonCenter for Perinatology, Women's Health, and Reproduction (CLAP/PAHO), Montevideo, Uruguay.
Venkatraman Chandra-MouliWorld Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescent fertility rates in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) remain unacceptably high, especially compared to the region's declining total fertility rates. The Region has experienced the slowest progress of all regions in the world, and shows major differences between countries and between subgroups in countries. In 2013, LAC was also noted as the only region with a rising trend in pregnancies in adolescents younger than 15 years. In response to the lack of progress in the LAC region, PAHO/WHO, UNFPA and UNICEF held a technical consultation with global, regional and country-level stakeholders to take stock of the situation and agree on strategic approaches and priority actions to accelerate progress. The meeting concluded that there is no single portrait of an adolescent mother in LAC and that context and determinants of adolescent pregnancy vary across and within countries. However, lack of knowledge about their sexual and reproductive health and rights, poor access to and inadequate use of contraceptives resulting from restrictive laws and policies, weak programs, social and cultural norms, limited education and income, sexual violence and abuse, and unequal gender relations were identified as key factors contributing to adolescent pregnancy in LAC. The meeting participants highlighted the following seven priority actions to accelerate progress: 1. Make adolescent pregnancy, its drivers and impact, and the most affected groups more visible with disaggregated data, qualitative reports, and stories. 2. Design interventions targeting the most vulnerable groups, ensuring the approaches are adapted to their realities and address their specific challenges. 3. Engage and empower youth to contribute to the design, implementation and monitoring of strategic interventions. 4. Abandon ineffective interventions and invest resources in applying proven ones. 5. Strengthen inter-sectoral collaboration to effectively address the drivers of adolescent pregnancy in LAC. 6. Move from boutique projects to large-scale and sustainable programs. 7. Create an enabling environment for gender equality and adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityAdolescentCaribbean RegionFemaleHumansLatin AmericaPregnancyPregnancy in AdolescenceReproductive Health ServicesSex EducationSocioeconomic FactorsAdolescent pregnancyEquityLatin America and the Caribbean

Identifiers

PMID28705166
PMCPMC5512880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.