Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28705157›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2017

Ward social workers' views of what facilitates or hinders collaboration with specialist palliative care team social workers: A grounded theory.

Janice Firn, Nancy Preston, Catherine Walshe

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Janice FirnDivision of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, Michigan Medicine, F7902 UH South, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, SPC 5233, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. jfirn@med.umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4668-1011
Nancy PrestonDivision of Health Research, C52, Furness Building, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK.
Catherine WalsheDivision of Health Research, C52, Furness Building, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInpatient, generalist social workers in discharge planning roles work alongside specialist palliative care social workers to care for patients, often resulting in two social workers being concurrently involved in the same patient's care. Previous studies identifying components of effective collaboration, which impacts patient outcomes, care efficiency, professional job satisfaction, and healthcare costs, were conducted with nurses and physicians but not social workers. This study explores ward social workers' perceptions of what facilitates or hinders collaboration with palliative care social workers.

methodsGrounded theory was used to explore the research aim. In-depth qualitative interviews with masters trained ward social workers (n = 14) working in six hospitals located in the Midwest, United States were conducted between February 2014 and January 2015. A theoretical model of ward social workers' collaboration with palliative care social workers was developed.

resultsThe emerging model of collaboration consists of: 1) trust, which is comprised of a) ability, b) benevolence, and c) integrity, 2) information sharing, and 3) role negotiation. Effective collaboration occurs when all elements of the model are present.

conclusionCollaboration is facilitated when ward social workers' perceptions of trust are high, pertinent information is communicated in a time-sensitive manner, and a flexible approach to roles is taken. The theoretical model of collaboration can inform organisational policy and social work clinical practice guidelines, and may be of use to other healthcare professionals, as improvements in collaboration among healthcare providers may have a positive impact on patient outcomes.

Indexed as

PerceptionAdultCooperative BehaviorFemaleGrounded TheoryHumansInterprofessional RelationsMiddle AgedMidwestern United StatesPalliative CarePatient Care TeamQualitative ResearchSocial WorkSocial WorkersWorkforceCooperative behaviourGrounded theoryPalliative careQualitative researchSocial work

Identifiers

PMID28705157
PMCPMC5513353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.