Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28704946›Full record

ReviewCells2017

Exploring Autophagy in Drosophila.

Péter Lőrincz, Caroline Mauvezin, Gábor Juhász

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Interplay between autophagy and CncC regulates dendrite pruning inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Toxics · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Small-Molecule Enhancers of Autophagy AUTEN-67 and -99 Delay Ageing inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Péter LőrinczDepartment of Anatomy, Cell and Developmental Biology, Eötvös Loránd University, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary. concrete05@gmail.com.
Caroline MauvezinCatalan Institute of Oncology-IDIBELL, Laboratory of Cancer Metabolism (LMC), Hospital Duran i Reynals, 08908 Barcelona, Spain. caroline.mauvezin@gmail.com.
Gábor JuhászDepartment of Anatomy, Cell and Developmental Biology, Eötvös Loránd University, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary. szmrt@elte.hu.
Eötvös Loránd University · HUInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autophagy is a catabolic process in eukaryotic cells promoting bulk or selective degradation of cellular components within lysosomes. In recent decades, several model systems were utilized to dissect the molecular machinery of autophagy and to identify the impact of this cellular "self-eating" process on various physiological and pathological processes. Here we briefly discuss the advantages and limitations of using the fruit fly

Indexed as

Atg8aautophagyDrosophilaRef(2)P/p62

Identifiers

PMID28704946
PMCPMC5617968
OpenAlexW2735471968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.