Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28704438›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Disentangling the root- and detritus-based food chain in the micro-food web of an arable soil by plant removal.

Olena Glavatska, Karolin Müller, Olaf Butenschoen, Andreas Schmalwasser, Ellen Kandeler, Stefan Scheu, Kai Uwe Totsche, Liliane Ruess

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Olena GlavatskaInstitute of Biology, Ecology Group, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Karolin MüllerInstitute of Soil Science and Land Evaluation, Soil Biology Department, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Olaf ButenschoenJ.F. Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology, Georg August University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Andreas SchmalwasserInstitute of Geosciences, Hydrogeology Section, Friedrich Schiller University of JenaJena, Germany.
Ellen KandelerInstitute of Soil Science and Land Evaluation, Soil Biology Department, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Stefan ScheuJ.F. Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology, Georg August University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Kai Uwe TotscheInstitute of Geosciences, Hydrogeology Section, Friedrich Schiller University of JenaJena, Germany.
Liliane RuessInstitute of Biology, Ecology Group, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8061-6208

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil food web structure and function is primarily determined by the major basal resources, which are living plant tissue, root exudates and dead organic matter. A field experiment was performed to disentangle the interlinkage of the root-and detritus-based soil food chains. An arable site was cropped either with maize, amended with maize shoot litter or remained bare soil, representing food webs depending on roots, aboveground litter and soil organic matter as predominant resource, respectively. The soil micro-food web, i.e. microorganisms and nematodes, was investigated in two successive years along a depth transect. The community composition of nematodes was used as model to determine the changes in the rhizosphere, detritusphere and bulk soil food web. In the first growing season the impact of treatments on the soil micro-food web was minor. In the second year plant-feeding nematodes increased under maize, whereas after harvest the Channel Index assigned promotion of the detritivore food chain, reflecting decomposition of root residues. The amendment with litter did not foster microorganisms, instead biomass of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria as well as that of fungi declined in the rooted zone. Likely higher grazing pressure by nematodes reduced microbial standing crop as bacterial and fungal feeders increased. However, populations at higher trophic levels were not promoted, indicating limited flux of litter resources along the food chain. After two years of bare soil microbial biomass and nematode density remained stable, pointing to soil organic matter-based resources that allow bridging periods with deprivation. Nematode communities were dominated by opportunistic taxa that are competitive at moderate resource supply. In sum, removal of plants from the system had less severe effects than expected, suggesting considerable food web resilience to the disruption of both the root and detrital carbon channel, pointing to a legacy of organic matter resources in arable soils.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaEcosystemFeeding BehaviorFood ChainFungiNematodaRhizosphereSoilSoil MicrobiologySoil

Identifiers

PMID28704438
PMCPMC5509179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.