Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28704370›Full record

ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2017

Insights into the sand fly saliva: Blood-feeding and immune interactions between sand flies, hosts, and Leishmania.

Tereza Lestinova, Iva Rohousova, Michal Sima, Camila I de Oliveira, Petr Volf

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
17.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Humoral and T-Cell-Mediated Immunity AgainstPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2024
    Review
  14. Assessment of the exposure toThe veterinary quarterly · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Comparative Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tereza LestinovaDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5518-2268
Iva RohousovaDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Michal SimaDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Camila I de OliveiraInstituto Gonçalo Moniz FIOCRUZ, Salvador, Brazil.
Petr VolfDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeishmaniases are parasitic diseases present worldwide that are transmitted to the vertebrate host by the bite of an infected sand fly during a blood feeding. Phlebotomine sand flies inoculate into the mammalian host Leishmania parasites embedded in promastigote secretory gel (PSG) with saliva, which is composed of a diverse group of molecules with pharmacological and immunomodulatory properties. METHODS AND

findingsIn this review, we focus on 3 main aspects of sand fly salivary molecules: (1) structure and composition of salivary glands, including the properties of salivary molecules related to hemostasis and blood feeding, (2) immunomodulatory properties of salivary molecules and the diverse impacts of these molecules on leishmaniasis, ranging from disease exacerbation to vaccine development, and (3) use of salivary molecules for field applications, including monitoring host exposure to sand flies and the risk of Leishmania transmission. Studies showed interesting differences between salivary proteins of Phlebotomus and Lutzomyia species, however, no data were ever published on salivary proteins of Sergentomyia species.

conclusionsIn the last 15 years, numerous studies have characterized sand fly salivary proteins and, in parallel, have addressed the impact of such molecules on the biology of the host-sand fly-parasite interaction. The results obtained shall pave the way for the development of field-application tools that could contribute to the management of leishmaniasis in endemic areas.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorAnimalsLeishmaniaPsychodidaeSalivaSalivary Proteins and PeptidesSalivary Proteins and Peptides

Identifiers

PMID28704370
PMCPMC5509103
OpenAlexW2736194851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.