A new view into prokaryotic cell biology from electron cryotomography.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

1. CryomicroscopyFaraday discussions · 2022
   Article
2. In Situ Imaging and Structure Determination of Biomolecular Complexes Using Electron Cryo-Tomography.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
   Article
3. Bacterial flagellar motor PL-ring disassembly subcomplexes are widespread and ancient.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
   Article
4. Tomographic Collection of Block-Based Sparse STEM Images: Practical Implementation and Impact on the Quality of the 3D Reconstructed Volume.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
   Article
5. In situ imaging of the bacterial flagellar motor disassembly and assembly processes.The EMBO journal · 2019
   Article
6. Microbiology spectrum · 2019
   Review
7. The presence and absence of periplasmic rings in bacterial flagellar motors correlates with stator type.eLife · 2019
   Article
8. Insights into the evolution of bacterial flagellar motors from high-throughput in situ electron cryotomography and subtomogram averaging.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2018
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Erratum for
  A new view into prokaryotic cell biology from electron cryotomography.2016

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.