Trial reportClinical cardiology2017
Rationale and design of a randomized trial of apixaban vs warfarin to evaluate atherosclerotic calcification and vulnerable plaque progression.
Trial report in Clinical cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Atrial fibrillation and risk of cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease: A meta-analysis of prospective studies.Clinical cardiology · 2017Pooled it
- Effect of icosapent ethyl on progression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with elevated triglycerides on statin therapy: final results of the EVAPORATE trial.European heart journal · 2020Trial
- Rationale and design of a randomized trial of apixaban vs warfarin to evaluate atherosclerotic calcification and vulnerable plaque progression.Clinical cardiology · 2017Trial
- Effects of Vitamin K2 and D Supplementation on Coronary Artery Disease in Men: A RCT.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
- Warfarin involvement, in comparison to NOACs, in the development of systemic atherosclerosis.Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia · 2022Review
- Review
- Direct-acting Anticoagulants in Chronic Coronary Syndromes.European cardiology · 2020Review
- Calcification of the heart: mechanisms and therapeutic avenues.Expert review of cardiovascular therapy · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are known to increase vascular calcification, suggesting increased cardiovascular disease events. Apixaban is an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor superior to warfarin at preventing stroke or systemic embolism and may stabilize coronary atherosclerosis. The potential benefits of avoiding VKA therapy and the favorable effects of factor Xa inhibitors could contribute to cardiovascular disease event reduction. We hypothesized that apixaban inhibits vascular calcification and coronary atherosclerosis progression compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study is a single-center, prospective, randomized, open-label study. From May 2014 to December 2015, 66 patients with nonvalvular AF who experienced VKA therapy were enrolled. Patients were randomized into either warfarin or apixaban cohorts and followed for 52 weeks. The primary objective is to compare the rate of change in coronary artery calcification (CAC) from baseline to follow-up in apixaban vs warfarin cohorts. The key secondary objective is to compare the rate of incident plaques and quantitative changes in plaque types between patients randomized to either warfarin or apixaban cohorts using serial coronary computed tomography angiography. Expert readers will blindly assess CAC and coronary artery plaques. It is thought that this trial will result in significant differences in CAC and coronary artery plaque progression between the VKA and apixaban. The results are anticipated to provide a novel insight into treatment selection for AF patients. The study is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 02090075).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.