Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28703769›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2017

Glycosaminoglycans Regulate CXCR3 Ligands at Distinct Levels: Protection against Processing by Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV/CD26 and Interference with Receptor Signaling.

Mieke Metzemaekers, Anneleen Mortier, Rik Janssens, Daiane Boff, Lotte Vanbrabant, Nicole Lamoen, Jo Van Damme, Mauro M Teixeira, Ingrid De Meester, Flávio A Amaral and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Targeting of Glycosaminoglycans in Genetic and Inflammatory Airway Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Role of extracellular matrix proteoglycans in immune cell recruitment.International journal of experimental pathology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Perspectives on the Biological Role of Chemokine:Glycosaminoglycan Interactions.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Neutrophils: Beneficial and Harmful Cells in Septic Arthritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Regulation of Chemokine-Receptor Interactions and Functions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mieke MetzemaekersLaboratory of Molecular Immunology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 1042, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. mieke.metzemaekers@kuleuven.be.
Anneleen MortierLaboratory of Molecular Immunology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 1042, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. anneleen_mortier@hotmail.com.
Rik JanssensLaboratory of Molecular Immunology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 1042, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. rik.janssens@kuleuven.be.
Daiane BoffLaboratory of Molecular Immunology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 1042, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. daianebff@gmail.com.
Lotte VanbrabantLaboratory of Molecular Immunology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 1042, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. lotte.vanbrabant@kuleuven.be.
Nicole LamoenLaboratory of Medical Biochemistry, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1 S6, Wilrijk B-2610, Belgium. ingrid.demeester@uantwerpen.be.
Jo Van DammeLaboratory of Molecular Immunology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 1042, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. jo.vandamme@kuleuven.be.
Mauro M TeixeiraImunofarmacologia, Departamento de Bioquímica e Imunologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av Antonio Carlos 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Minas Gerais, Brazil. mmtex.ufmg@gmail.com.
Ingrid De MeesterLaboratory of Medical Biochemistry, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1 S6, Wilrijk B-2610, Belgium.
Flávio A AmaralImunofarmacologia, Departamento de Bioquímica e Imunologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av Antonio Carlos 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Minas Gerais, Brazil. dr.famaral@gmail.com.
Paul ProostLaboratory of Molecular Immunology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 1042, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. paul.proost@kuleuven.be.
Rega Institute for Medical Research · BEUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CXC chemokine ligand (CXCL)9, CXCL10 and CXCL11 direct chemotaxis of mainly T cells and NK cells through activation of their common CXC chemokine receptor (CXCR)3. They are inactivated upon NH₂-terminal cleavage by dipeptidyl peptidase IV/CD26. In the present study, we found that different glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) protect the CXCR3 ligands against proteolytic processing by CD26 without directly affecting the enzymatic activity of CD26. In addition, GAGs were shown to interfere with chemokine-induced CXCR3 signaling. The observation that heparan sulfate did not, and heparin only moderately, altered CXCL10-induced T cell chemotaxis in vitro may be explained by a combination of protection against proteolytic inactivation and altered receptor interaction as observed in calcium assays. No effect of CD26 inhibition was found on CXCL10-induced chemotaxis in vitro. However, treatment of mice with the CD26 inhibitor sitagliptin resulted in an enhanced CXCL10-induced lymphocyte influx into the joint. This study reveals a dual role for GAGs in modulating the biological activity of CXCR3 ligands. GAGs protect the chemokines from proteolytic cleavage but also directly interfere with chemokine-CXCR3 signaling. These data support the hypothesis that both GAGs and CD26 affect the in vivo chemokine function.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell MembraneChemokine CXCL10Chemotaxis, LeukocyteCHO CellsCricetinaeCricetulusDipeptidyl Peptidase 4GlycosaminoglycansHeparinHumansInterferon-gammaJointsLigandsMiceProtein BindingChemokine CXCL10Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4GlycosaminoglycansHeparinInterferon-gammaLigandsReceptors, CXCR3Sitagliptin PhosphateCD26chemokineCXCR3dipeptidyl peptidase IVglycosaminoglycanleukocyte migrationposttranslational modification

Identifiers

PMID28703769
PMCPMC5536003
OpenAlexW2735681284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.