Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28703654›Full record

ReviewEpigenetics2017

Do social insects support Haig's kin theory for the evolution of genomic imprinting?

Mirko Pegoraro, Hollie Marshall, Zoë N Lonsdale, Eamonn B Mallon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epigenetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genome Evolution in Social Insects.Genome biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Parent-of-origin effects, allele-specific expression, genomic imprinting and paternal manipulation in social insects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mirko Pegoraroa Department of Genetics and Genome Biology , University of Leicester , UK.
Hollie Marshalla Department of Genetics and Genome Biology , University of Leicester , UK.
Zoë N Lonsdalea Department of Genetics and Genome Biology , University of Leicester , UK.
Eamonn B Mallona Department of Genetics and Genome Biology , University of Leicester , UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although numerous imprinted genes have been described in several lineages, the phenomenon of genomic imprinting presents a peculiar evolutionary problem. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain gene imprinting, the most supported being Haig's kinship theory. This theory explains the observed pattern of imprinting and the resulting phenotypes as a competition for resources between related individuals, but despite its relevance it has not been independently tested. Haig's theory predicts that gene imprinting should be present in eusocial insects in many social scenarios. These lineages are therefore ideal for testing both the theory's predictions and the mechanism of gene imprinting. Here we review the behavioral evidence of genomic imprinting in eusocial insects, the evidence of a mechanism for genomic imprinting and finally we evaluate recent results showing parent of origin allele specific expression in honeybees in the light of Haig's theory.

Indexed as

EpigenomicsGenomic ImprintingModels, GeneticAnimalsBeesChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyDNA MethylationEvolution, MolecularSocial BehaviorEpigeneticsevolutiongenomic imprintingHaig's theorysocial insects

Identifiers

PMID28703654
PMCPMC5739101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.