ArticleNature2017
Tundra uptake of atmospheric elemental mercury drives Arctic mercury pollution.
Article in Nature, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coupled and decoupled carbon-mercury dynamics across forest ecosystem continua.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Seasonal Variability in Marine Atmospheric Mercury Isotope Signatures and Environmental Drivers.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
- Beyond the tropopause hypothesis: Drivers of even mercury isotope fractionation unraveled by 3D modeling.Science advances · 2025Article
- Atmospheric source of mercury to the ocean constrained by isotopic model.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Mercury Isotope Variability in Pyrenean Lake Sediments during the Late Holocene: Sources, Deposition, and Environmental Controls.ACS earth & space chemistry · 2025Article
- Stable isotopes unveil ocean transport of legacy mercury into Arctic food webs.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Assessing mercury exposure to water and fish of the Mackenzie watershed using a Bayesian network analysis.Integrated environmental assessment and management · 2025Article
- Oceanic evasion fuels Arctic summertime rebound of atmospheric mercury and drives transport to Arctic terrestrial ecosystems.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Atmospheric Hg(0) dry deposition over environmental surfaces: Insights from mercury isotope fractionation.Eco-Environment & Health · 2024Review
- Near surface oxidation of elemental mercury leads to mercury exposure in the Arctic Ocean biota.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Geographic Drivers of Mercury Entry into Aquatic Food Webs Revealed by Mercury Stable Isotopes in Dragonfly Larvae.Environmental science & technology · 2024Article
- Quantifying soil accumulation of atmospheric mercury using fallout radionuclide chronometry.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Potential decoupling of CONature communications · 2024Article
- In-situ low-temperature sulfur CVD on metal sulfides with SONature communications · 2024Article
- Process of mercury accumulation in urban strip river artificial wetland ecosystems: a case study of Changchun, a typical industrial city in Northeast China.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Mercury deposition and redox transformation processes in peatland constrained by mercury stable isotopes.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Retention properties and mechanism of agricultural waste maize whisker on atmospheric mercury.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2023Article
- Article
- Comparing ecosystem gaseous elemental mercury fluxes over a deciduous and coniferous forest.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anthropogenic activities have led to large-scale mercury (Hg) pollution in the Arctic. It has been suggested that sea-salt-induced chemical cycling of Hg (through 'atmospheric mercury depletion events', or AMDEs) and wet deposition via precipitation are sources of Hg to the Arctic in its oxidized form (Hg(ii)). However, there is little evidence for the occurrence of AMDEs outside of coastal regions, and their importance to net Hg deposition has been questioned. Furthermore, wet-deposition measurements in the Arctic showed some of the lowest levels of Hg deposition via precipitation worldwide, raising questions as to the sources of high Arctic Hg loading. Here we present a comprehensive Hg-deposition mass-balance study, and show that most of the Hg (about 70%) in the interior Arctic tundra is derived from gaseous elemental Hg (Hg(0)) deposition, with only minor contributions from the deposition of Hg(ii) via precipitation or AMDEs. We find that deposition of Hg(0)-the form ubiquitously present in the global atmosphere-occurs throughout the year, and that it is enhanced in summer through the uptake of Hg(0) by vegetation. Tundra uptake of gaseous Hg(0) leads to high soil Hg concentrations, with Hg masses greatly exceeding the levels found in temperate soils. Our concurrent Hg stable isotope measurements in the atmosphere, snowpack, vegetation and soils support our finding that Hg(0) dominates as a source to the tundra. Hg concentration and stable isotope data from an inland-to-coastal transect show high soil Hg concentrations consistently derived from Hg(0), suggesting that the Arctic tundra might be a globally important Hg sink. We suggest that the high tundra soil Hg concentrations might also explain why Arctic rivers annually transport large amounts of Hg to the Arctic Ocean.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28703199What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.