ArticleAssessment2019
Evaluating the Ecological Validity of the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire Among Obese Adults Using Ecological Momentary Assessment.
Article in Assessment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Brief State Rumination Inventory.Frontiers in public health · 2022Trial
- Understanding eating behaviors in obesity: a DEBQ-based analysis of clinical and demographic factors.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Assessment of Eating Behavior and Genetic Risk Factors for Metabolic Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Associations of self-control and dietary restraint with the home food environment during pregnancy and postpartum.Appetite · 2026Article
- Ecological momentary assessment of weight-related stress predicting eating disorder and affective symptoms.Body image · 2025Article
- Article
- Indirect Effects of Body Mass Index and Sweet Taste Responsiveness on E-Cigarette Dependence: The Role of E-Cigarette Motives.Substance use & misuse · 2024Observational
- Article
- Validation of the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire in a Romanian Adult Population.Nutrients · 2021Article
- The effect of mood on food versus non-food interference among females who are high and low on emotional eating.Journal of eating disorders · 2021Article
- Emotional eating in healthy individuals and patients with an eating disorder: evidence from psychometric, experimental and naturalistic studies.The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · 2020Review
- Why We Eat What We Eat: Assessing Dispositional and In-the-Moment Eating Motives by Using Ecological Momentary Assessment.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
- Article
- Moving beyond self-report data collection in the natural environment: A review of the past and future directions for ambulatory assessment in eating disorders.The International journal of eating disorders · 2019Review
- State and trait positive and negative affectivity in relation to restraint intention and binge eating among adults with obesity.Appetite · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the ecological validity (i.e., accurate measurement of a construct as experienced in naturalistic settings) of the self-report Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ). Obese adults (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.