Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28702895›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2017

FANCM mutation c.5791C>T is a risk factor for triple-negative breast cancer in the Finnish population.

Johanna I Kiiski, Anna Tervasmäki, Liisa M Pelttari, Sofia Khan, Tuomo Mantere, Katri Pylkäs, Arto Mannermaa, Maria Tengström, Anders Kvist, Åke Borg and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Breast-Ovarian Hereditary Cancer Syndrome: BeyondCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Breast Cancer Is Increased in Women With Primary Ovarian Insufficiency.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Spectrum ofCancers · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Johanna I KiiskiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Anna TervasmäkiLaboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Liisa M PelttariDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Sofia KhanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Tuomo MantereLaboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Katri PylkäsLaboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Arto MannermaaSchool of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Cancer Center of Eastern Finland, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Maria TengströmSchool of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oncology, Kuopio, Finland.
Anders KvistDivision of Oncology and Pathology Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden.
Åke BorgDivision of Oncology and Pathology Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden.
Veli-Matti KosmaSchool of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Cancer Center of Eastern Finland, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Anne KallioniemiBioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, and Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland.
Johanna SchleutkerDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Genetics, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Ralf BützowDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Carl BlomqvistDepartment of Oncology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Kristiina AittomäkiDepartment of Clinical Genetics, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Robert WinqvistLaboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Heli NevanlinnaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital (HUS), PO Box 700, 00029, Helsinki, Finland. heli.nevanlinna@hus.fi.
University of Helsinki · FINordLab · FILund University · SEUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FIKuopio University Hospital · FITampere University · FIUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe FANCM c.5101C>T nonsense mutation was previously found to associate with breast cancer in the Finnish population, especially among triple-negative cases. Here, we studied the prevalence of three other FANCM variants: c.5791C>T, which has been reported to predispose to familial breast cancer, and the c.4025_4026delCT and c.5293dupA variants recently identified in Finnish cancer patients.

methodsWe genotyped the FANCM c.5791C>T mutation in 4806 invasive breast cancer patients, including BRCA1/2 mutation negative familial cases and unselected cases, and in 2734 healthy population controls from four different geographical areas of Finland. The association of the mutation with breast cancer risk among patient subgroups was statistically evaluated. We further analyzed the combined risk associated with c.5101C>T and c.5791C>T mutations. We also genotyped 526 unselected ovarian cancer patients for the c.5791C>T mutation and 862 familial breast cancer patients for the c.4025_4026delCT and c.5293dupA variants.

resultsThe frequency of the FANCM c.5791C>T mutation was higher among breast cancer cases than in controls (OR 1.94, 95% CI 0.87-4.32, P = 0.11), with a statistically significant association with triple-negative breast cancer (OR 5.14, 95% CI 1.65-16.0, P = 0.005). The combined analysis for c.5101C>T and c.5791C>T carriers confirmed a strong association with breast cancer (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.32-2.49, P = 0.0002), especially among the triple-negative patients (OR 3.08, 95% CI 1.77-5.35, P = 0.00007). For the other variants, only one additional c.4025_4026delCT carrier and no c.5293dupA carriers were observed.

conclusionsThese results support the role of FANCM as a breast cancer susceptibility gene, particularly for triple-negative breast cancer.

Indexed as

AllelesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseMutationCase-Control StudiesDNA HelicasesDNA RepairFemaleFinlandGene DuplicationGene FrequencyGenotypeHumansOdds RatioPopulation SurveillanceRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsDNA HelicasesFANCM protein, humanBreast cancerDNA repairFamilial breast cancerFANCMTriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID28702895
PMCPMC5645429
OpenAlexW2734915100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.