Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28702834›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2017

The recalibration of tactile perception during tool use is body-part specific.

Luke E Miller, Andrew Cawley-Bennett, Matthew R Longo, Ayse P Saygin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rescaling perceptual hand maps by visual-tactile recalibration.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Humans sense by touch the location of objects that roll in handheld containers.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023
    Article
  9. Embodiment for Robotic Lower-Limb Exoskeletons: A Narrative Review.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Anisotropies of tactile distance perception on the face.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luke E MillerDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, USA. luke.miller@inserm.fr.
Andrew Cawley-BennettDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, USA.
Matthew R LongoDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.
Ayse P SayginDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, USA.

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCET32MH020002 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SEJNOWSKI, TERRENCE J · 1999 to 2020
$6.1M
European Research Council ERC-StG-336050National Science Foundation BCS1151805NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two decades of research have demonstrated that using a tool modulates spatial representations of the body. Whether this embodiment is specific to representations of the tool-using limb or extends to representations of other body parts has received little attention. Several studies of other perceptual phenomena have found that modulations to the primary somatosensory representation of the hand transfers to the face, due in part to their close proximity in primary somatosensory cortex. In the present study, we investigated whether tool-induced recalibration of tactile perception on the hand transfers to the cheek. Participants verbally estimated the distance between two tactile points applied to either their hand or face, before and after using a hand-shaped tool. Tool use recalibrated tactile distance perception on the hand-in line with previous findings-but left perception on the cheek unchanged. This finding provides support for the idea that embodiment is body-part specific. Furthermore, it suggests that tool-induced perceptual recalibration occurs at a level of somatosensory processing, where representations of the hand and face have become functionally disentangled.

Indexed as

AdultCalibrationCheekDistance PerceptionFemaleHandHumansMaleMotor ActivityPsychomotor PerformanceSomatosensory CortexTouch PerceptionYoung AdultBody representationEmbodimentPerceptionPsychophysicsTool useTouch

Identifiers

PMID28702834
PMCPMC5957296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.