ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2017
[Splice variant AR-V7 : Is it time for its routine use as a predictive marker in prostate cancer?]
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in the Current Understanding of the Mechanisms Governing the Acquisition of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.Cancers · 2022Review
- Urinary exosome-based androgen receptor-variant 7 detection in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.Translational andrology and urology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Androgen receptor splice variants (AR-Vs), if overexpressed, lack the ligand-binding domain conveying metastasized castration-resistant prostate cancer with a therapeutic resistance to androgen receptor signaling inhibitors. Particularly AR-V7 has recently been proposed as a potential predictive biomarker to identify patients who would probably benefit most from taxane-based cytotoxic treatment. Several assays to substantiate or quantify AR-V7 expression have recently been proposed. However, their broad clinical value is still debatable. This contemporary update aims to shed light on the current evidence in the field and draw distinct practical conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.