ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2017
Value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in predicting left ventricular recovery in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy.
Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Outcomes of subsequent pregnancy in women with peripartum cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Open heart · 2024Pooled it
- Prognostic value of various markers in recovery from peripartum cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ESC heart failure · 2022Pooled it
- Immune dysregulation as a key driver of peripartum cardiomyopathy - an exploratory advanced imaging and biomarker study.European journal of heart failure · 2025Article
- Multifaceted roles of neutrophils in cardiac disease.Journal of leukocyte biology · 2025Review
- Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and Peripartum Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Prevalence and Impact on Left Ventricular Function and Mortality.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in predicting left ventricular (LV) recovery in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM).
methodsPatients with PPCM (n = 40), who were admitted to our tertiary reference hospital between 2007 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were followed-up for at least 12 months after the diagnosis. All patients had standard echocardiographic examination at baseline and the last follow-up visit. Recovery of LV function was defined as the presence of LV ejection fraction (EF) >45%. Data on blood parameters were also collected at baseline. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to assess the significant predictive variables for persistent LV systolic dysfunction.
resultsOf the patients 21 (52.5%) did not recover LV function at the last follow-up visit (nonrecovery group), while 19 of the patients (47.5%) exhibited LV recovery (recovery group). The LV EF and fractional shortening (FS) were significantly lower in the nonrecovery group. The baseline LV end-diastolic diameter, LV end-systolic diameter (LVESD) and systolic pulmonary arterial pressure were significantly increased in the nonrecovery group. The NLR, C‑reactive protein and troponin levels were significantly higher in the nonrecovery group. In multivariate logistic regression analysis only NLR and LVESD were identified as independent predictors of persistent LV systolic dysfunction in patients with PPCM (p = 0.020 and p = 0.009 respectively).
conclusionElevated NLR and increased LVESD were independent prognostic factors in predicting persistent LV dysfunction in patients with PPCM. The NLR might assist in identifying high risk patients with PPCM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28702739What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.