Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28702693›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2017

[Ultrasonography of the prostate gland : From B‑image through multiparametric ultrasound to targeted biopsy].

F Steinkohl, A Luger, J Bektic, F Aigner

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F SteinkohlUniversitätsklinik für Radiologie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Österreich. fabian.steinkohl@tirol-kliniken.at.
A LugerUniversitätsklinik für Radiologie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Österreich.
J BekticUniversitätsklinik für Urologie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Österreich.
F AignerUniversitätsklinik für Radiologie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Österreich.
Innsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer is the most frequent cancer in men. The diagnosis is normally achieved by a systematic prostate biopsy; however, this is a randomized approach by which a substantial number of significant carcinomas go undetected. For this reason, in recent years imaging techniques have been continuously developed, which enable visualization and therefore targeted biopsies. STANDARD PROCEDURE: The use of systematic biopsies is a standard procedure for the detection of prostate cancer. The quality of biopsies can be increased if the prostate is examined for the presence of suspected cancerous alterations during the biopsy. This can be carried out using multiparametric transrectral ultrasound. PERFORMANCE: Multiparametric ultrasound within the framework of a targeted biopsy increases the detection rate of significant prostate carcinomas with a simultaneous decrease in detection of insignificant carcinomas; however, the diagnostic reliability and the evidence level of multiparametric transrectal ultrasound are not yet sufficiently high to be able to replace a systematic biopsy.

conclusionIn the hands of a well-trained examiner multiparametric transrectal ultrasound represents a good method for detection of prostate carcinomas. With the progression in technical developments of ultrasound technology, the detection rate will presumably be further increased.

Indexed as

CarcinomaHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleProstateProstatic NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsUltrasonography, InterventionalDetection rateDiagnostic reliabilityEvidence levelMultiparametric transrectal ultrasoundProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID28702693
OpenAlexW2734564919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.