Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28702689›Full record

ArticlePlanta2017

Molecular responses to recurrent drought in two contrasting rice genotypes.

Priscila Ariane Auler, Marcelo Nogueira do Amaral, Gabriela Dos Santos Rodrigues, Letícia Carvalho Benitez, Luciano Carlos da Maia, Gustavo Maia Souza, Eugenia Jacira Bolacel Braga

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Priscila Ariane AulerDepartment of Botany, Biology Institute, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil. priscila.auler@ufpel.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9045-7626
Marcelo Nogueira do AmaralDepartment of Botany, Biology Institute, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Gabriela Dos Santos RodriguesDepartment of Botany, Biology Institute, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Letícia Carvalho BenitezAcademic Unit of Exact Sciences and Nature, University Federal of Campina Grande, Campus Cajazeiras, Cajazeiras, PB, Brazil.
Luciano Carlos da MaiaPlant Breeding Center, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Gustavo Maia SouzaDepartment of Botany, Biology Institute, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Eugenia Jacira Bolacel BragaDepartment of Botany, Biology Institute, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Pelotas · BRUniversidade Federal de Campina Grande · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionThe set of variables analyzed as integrated by multivariate analysis of principal components consistently showed a memory effect induced by the drought pre-treatment in AN Cambará plants. The effects of drought can vary ddepending on many factors. Among these the occurrence of a previous water stress may leave a residual effect (memory), influencing the future performance of a plant in response to a new drought event. This study tested the hypothesis that plants experiencing recurrent drought would show more active mechanisms of water deficit tolerance, mainly plants of the genotype that is cultivated often experiencing water shortages periods. Additionally, all the plants subjected to water deficit were rehydrated by 24 h and the expression of transcription factors related to drought responses was re-evaluated. To this end, the water status of two rice genotypes, BRS Querência (flooded) and AN Cambará (dryland), was evaluated to identify molecular alterations likely underpinning drought-memory. In growth stage V5, some plants were exposed to water stress (10% VWC soil moisture-pre-treatment). Thereafter, the pots were rehydrated at the same level as the control pots and maintained under this condition until drought was reapplied (10% VWC) at the reproductive stage (R1-R2). Then, the plants were rehydrated and maintained at pot capacity for 24 h. Overall, the set of variables analyzed integrally by multivariate analysis of principal components consistently showed a memory effect induced by the drought pre-treatment in AN Cambará plants (the dryland genotype). This conclusion, based on data of the biochemical and molecular analyses, was supported by the greater capacity of maintenance of the water status by stomatal regulation of the pre-treated and rehydrated plants after the second drought stimulus.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantStress, PhysiologicalAntioxidantsDehydrationDroughtsGene Expression ProfilingGenotypeHydrogen PeroxideLipid PeroxidationOryzaPlant ProteinsPlant StomataProlineSoilWaterAntioxidantsHydrogen PeroxidePlant ProteinsProlineSoilWaterAntioxidant enzymesbZIPDREBOryza sativa L.RecoveryStress memoryTranscription factorsWater deficit

Identifiers

PMID28702689
OpenAlexW2734366521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.