Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28702612›Full record

ArticleLab on a chip2017

Rapid, label-free CD4 testing using a smartphone compatible device.

Manoj Kumar Kanakasabapathy, Hardik J Pandya, Mohamed Shehata Draz, Manjyot Kaur Chug, Magesh Sadasivam, Shreya Kumar, Behzad Etemad, Vinish Yogesh, Mohammadali Safavieh, Waseem Asghar and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab on a chip, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Virus Detection: From State-of-the-Art Laboratories to Smartphone-Based Point-of-Care Testing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Lab-on-a-Chip Devices for Point-of-Care Medical Diagnostics.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Manoj Kumar KanakasabapathyDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02139, USA. hshafiee@bwh.harvard.edu.
Hardik J Pandya
Mohamed Shehata Draz
Manjyot Kaur Chug
Magesh Sadasivam
Shreya Kumar
Behzad Etemad
Vinish Yogesh
Mohammadali Safavieh
Waseem Asghar
Jonathan Z Li
Athe M Tsibris
Daniel R Kuritzkes
Hadi Shafiee

Funding

The impact of HIV viral diversity and cellular immunity on HIV pathogenesisP30AI060354 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI ROBERT A. PARKER · 2004 to 2026
$94.4M
Translational Research Support CoreP30ES000002 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI SUSAN A KORRICK · 1985 to 2026
$44.6M
Sensitive and quantitative point-of-care viral load testing on paperR01AI118502 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SHAFIEE, HADI · 2016 to 2020
$2.2M
Development of disposable and refrigeration-free microchip technology for CD4+ T cell counting at point-of-care settingsR15AI127214 · NIAID · FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY · PI ASGHAR, WASEEM · 2016 to 2016
$460k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI060354NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI118502NIAID NIH HHS R15 AI127214NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES000002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most recent guidelines have called for a significant shift towards viral load testing for HIV/AIDS management in developing countries; however point-of-care (POC) CD4 testing still remains an important component of disease staging in multiple developing countries. Advancements in micro/nanotechnologies and consumer electronics have paved the way for mobile healthcare technologies and the development of POC smartphone-based diagnostic assays for disease detection and treatment monitoring. Here, we report a simple, rapid (30 minutes) smartphone-based microfluidic chip for automated CD4 testing using a small volume (30 μL) of whole blood. The smartphone-based device includes an inexpensive (<$5) cell phone accessory and a functionalized disposable microfluidic device. We evaluated the performance of the device using spiked PBS samples and HIV-infected and uninfected whole blood, and compared the microfluidic chip results with the manual analysis and flow cytometry results. Through t-tests, Bland-Altman analyses, and regression tests, we have shown a good agreement between the smartphone-based test and the manual and FACS analysis for CD4 count. The presented technology could have a significant impact on HIV management in developing countries through providing a reliable and inexpensive POC CD4 testing.

Indexed as

CD4 Lymphocyte CountMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesPoint-of-Care TestingSmartphoneHIV InfectionsHumansLab-On-A-Chip DevicesMobile Applications

Identifiers

PMID28702612
PMCPMC5576172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.