Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28702210›Full record

ArticleObesity science & practice2017

Successful weight loss maintainers use health-tracking smartphone applications more than a nationally representative sample: comparison of the National Weight Control Registry to Pew Tracking for Health.

C M Goldstein, J G Thomas, R R Wing, D S Bond

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity science & practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Successful weight loss maintenance: A systematic review of weight control registries.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C M GoldsteinDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School Brown University Providence USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6150-5649
J G ThomasDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School Brown University Providence USA.
R R WingDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School Brown University Providence USA.
D S BondDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School Brown University Providence USA.
Brown University · US

Funding

Training in Behavioral & Preventive MedicineT32HL076134 · NHLBI · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI John Graham Thomas · 2006 to 2026
$5.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL076134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this paper is to evaluate successful weight loss maintainers' use of self-monitoring technology.

methodsNational Weight Control Registry (NWCR) participants, who maintained a ≥13.6 kg weight loss for ≥1 year, completed an online survey about self-monitoring technology use. The NWCR sample (

resultsThe NWCR had higher rates of tracking weight, diet or exercise using any modality (92.8% vs. 71.3%), on a regular basis (67.4% vs. 41.3%), and frequency of updating records, compared with Pew (

conclusionUse of self-monitoring technology is common in weight loss maintainers: more so than in a nationally representative sample. However, the national sample more often changed their behaviour based on tracking data, perhaps suggesting that weight loss maintainers could derive additional benefit from technology they are already using.

Indexed as

Body weight maintenancehealth trackingonline trackerssmartphoneweight loss

Identifiers

PMID28702210
PMCPMC5478812
OpenAlexW2572611732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.