Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28702198›Full record

ArticleNew microbes and new infections2017

J A Sáez-Nieto, M J Medina-Pascual, G Carrasco, N Garrido, M A Fernandez-Torres, P Villalón, S Valdezate

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in New microbes and new infections, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Retrospective Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Unveiling a New Antimicrobial Peptide with Efficacy againstAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Whole-genome sequencing ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J A Sáez-NietoTaxonomy Laboratory, Bacteriology Area, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
M J Medina-PascualTaxonomy Laboratory, Bacteriology Area, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
G CarrascoTaxonomy Laboratory, Bacteriology Area, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
N GarridoTaxonomy Laboratory, Bacteriology Area, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
M A Fernandez-TorresTaxonomy Laboratory, Bacteriology Area, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
P VillalónTaxonomy Laboratory, Bacteriology Area, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
S ValdezateTaxonomy Laboratory, Bacteriology Area, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One hundred thirty-six isolates, 88 human and 48 environmental, that met the requirements to belong to the genus

Indexed as

Clinical samplesenvironmental isolatesnew speciesPaenibacilluspolyphasic taxonomy

Identifiers

PMID28702198
PMCPMC5484988
OpenAlexW2619124175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.