Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28701966›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2017

Quantifying and Modeling Coordination and Coherence in Pedestrian Groups.

Adam W Kiefer, Kevin Rio, Stéphane Bonneaud, Ashley Walton, William H Warren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adam W KieferDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown UniversityProvidence, RI, United States.
Kevin RioDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown UniversityProvidence, RI, United States.
Stéphane BonneaudDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown UniversityProvidence, RI, United States.
Ashley WaltonCenter for Cognition, Action and Perception, Department of Psychology, University of CincinnatiCincinnati, OH, United States.
William H WarrenDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown UniversityProvidence, RI, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coherent collective behavior emerges from local interactions between individuals that generate group dynamics. An outstanding question is how to quantify group coordination of non-rhythmic behavior, in order to understand the nature of these dynamics at both a local and global level. We investigate this problem in the context of a small group of four pedestrians walking to a goal, treating their speed, and heading as behavioral variables. To measure the local coordination between pairs of pedestrians, we employ cross-correlation to estimate coupling strength and cross-recurrence quantification (CRQ) analysis to estimate dynamic stability. When compared to reshuffled virtual control groups, the results indicate lower-dimensional behavior and a stronger, more stable coupling of walking speed in real groups. There were no differences in heading alignment observed between the real and virtual groups, due to the common goal. By modeling the local speed coupling, we can simulate coordination at the dyad and group levels. The findings demonstrate spontaneous coordination in pedestrian groups that gives rise to coherent global behavior. They also offer a methodological approach for investigating group dynamics in more complex settings.

Indexed as

cross-recurrence quantificationgroup coordinationgroup locomotionprincipal components analysis

Identifiers

PMID28701966
PMCPMC5488766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.