Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28701873›Full record

ArticleJournal of ginseng research2017

Molecular differentiation of Russian wild ginseng using mitochondrial

Guisheng Li, Yan Cui, Hongtao Wang, Woo-Saeng Kwon, Deok-Chun Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ginseng research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Ancient herbal therapy: A brief history ofJournal of ginseng research · 2023
    Review
  3. Discrimination ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guisheng LiSchool of Pharmacy, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Ministry of Education), Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China.
Yan CuiSchool of Pharmacy, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Ministry of Education), Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China.
Hongtao WangSchool of Life Sciences, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China.
Woo-Saeng KwonKorean Ginseng Center for Most Valuable Products and Ginseng Genetic Resource Bank, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, Republic of Korea.
Deok-Chun YangKorean Ginseng Center for Most Valuable Products and Ginseng Genetic Resource Bank, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCultivated ginseng is often introduced as a substitute and adulterant of Russian wild ginseng due to its lower cost or misidentification caused by similarity in appearance with wild ginseng. The aim of this study is to develop a simple and reliable method to differentiate Russian wild ginseng from cultivated ginseng.

methodsThe mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 7 (

resultsAn SNP site specific to Russian wild ginseng was exploited by multiple alignments of mitochondrial

conclusionAn effective DNA method for molecular discrimination of Russian wild ginseng from Chinese and Korean cultivated ginseng was developed. The established real-time allele-specific PCR was simple and reliable, and the present method should be a crucial complement of chemical analysis for authentication of Russian wild ginseng.

Indexed as

allele-specific polymerase chain reactioncultivated ginsengnad7single nucleotide polymorphismwild ginseng

Identifiers

PMID28701873
PMCPMC5489753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.