Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28701838›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2017

A Retrospective Study of Physiological Observation-reporting Practices and the Recognition, Response, and Outcomes Following Cardiopulmonary Arrest in a Low-to-middle-income Country.

Ambepitiyawaduge Pubudu De Silva, Jayasingha Arachchilage Sujeewa, Nirodha De Silva, Rathnayake Mudiyanselage Danapala Rathnayake, Lakmal Vithanage, Ponsuge Chathurani Sigera, Sithum Munasinghe, Abi Beane, Tim Stephens, Priyantha Lakmini Athapattu and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ambepitiyawaduge Pubudu De SilvaNetwork for Improving Critical Care Systems and Training, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jayasingha Arachchilage SujeewaMonaragala District General Hospital, Monaragala, Sri Lanka.
Nirodha De SilvaMonaragala District General Hospital, Monaragala, Sri Lanka.
Rathnayake Mudiyanselage Danapala RathnayakeMonaragala District General Hospital, Monaragala, Sri Lanka.
Lakmal VithanageMonaragala District General Hospital, Monaragala, Sri Lanka.
Ponsuge Chathurani SigeraNetwork for Improving Critical Care Systems and Training, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sithum MunasingheNetwork for Improving Critical Care Systems and Training, Bangkok, Thailand.
Abi BeaneNetwork for Improving Critical Care Systems and Training, Bangkok, Thailand.
Tim StephensNetwork for Improving Critical Care Systems and Training, Bangkok, Thailand.
Priyantha Lakmini AthapattuOffice of Director Medical Services, Ministry of Health, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Kosala Saroj Amarasiri JayasingheFaculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Arjen M DondorpMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Tungphyathai, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rashan HaniffaNetwork for Improving Critical Care Systems and Training, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ministry of Public Health · THQueen Mary University of London · GBMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit · THUniversity of Colombo · LK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsIn Sri Lanka, as in most low-to-middle-income countries (LMICs), early warning systems (EWSs) are not in use. Understanding observation-reporting practices and response to deterioration is a necessary step in evaluating the feasibility of EWS implementation in a LMIC setting. This study describes the practices of observation reporting and the recognition and response to presumed cardiopulmonary arrest in a LMIC. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis retrospective study was carried out at District General Hospital Monaragala, Sri Lanka. One hundred and fifty adult patients who had cardiac arrests and were reported to a nurse responder were included in the study.

resultsAvailability of six parameters (excluding mentation) was significantly higher at admission (

conclusionsObservations commonly used to detect deterioration are poorly reported, and reporting practices would need to be improved prior to EWS implementation. These findings reinforce the need for training in acute care and resuscitation skills for health-care teams in LMIC settings as part of a program of improving recognition and response to acute deterioration.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary arrestdeteriorationearly warning systemlow-to-middle-income countryobservation

Identifiers

PMID28701838
PMCPMC5492734
OpenAlexW2735429769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.