Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28701762›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Different Repeat Annual Influenza Vaccinations Improve the Antibody Response to Drifted Influenza Strains.

Ewan P Plant, Lucy J Fredell, Blake A Hatcher, Xing Li, Meng-Jung Chiang, Martina Kosikova, Hang Xie, Olga Zoueva, Angelia A Cost, Zhiping Ye and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Systems Biological Analysis of Immune Response to Influenza Vaccination.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Diminished B-Cell Response After Repeat Influenza Vaccination.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Influenza vaccination and the 'diversity paradox'.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ewan P PlantDivision of Viral Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA. ewan.plant@fda.hhs.gov.
Lucy J FredellSidwell Friends School, Washington, DC, USA.
Blake A HatcherChapelgate Christian Academy, Marriottsville, MD, USA.
Xing LiDivision of Viral Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Meng-Jung ChiangDivision of Viral Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Martina KosikovaDivision of Viral Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Hang XieDivision of Viral Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Olga ZouevaDivision of Viral Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Angelia A CostArmed Forces Health Surveillance Center, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Zhiping YeDivision of Viral Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Michael J CooperArmed Forces Health Surveillance Center, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
United States Food and Drug Administration · USCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research · USArmed Forces Health Surveillance Center · USSidwell Friends School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seasonal influenza vaccine formulas change almost every year yet information about how this affects the antibody repertoire of vaccine recipients is inadequate. New vaccine virus strains are selected, replacing older strains to better match the currently circulating strains. But even while the vaccine is being manufactured the circulating strains can evolve. The ideal response to a seasonal vaccine would maintain antibodies toward existing strains that might continue to circulate, and to generate cross-reactive antibodies, particularly towards conserved influenza epitopes, potentially limiting infections caused by newly evolving strains. Here we use the hemagglutination inhibition assay to analyze the antibody repertoire in subjects vaccinated two years in a row with either identical vaccine virus strains or with differing vaccine virus strains. The data indicates that changing the vaccine formulation results in an antibody repertoire that is better able to react with strains emerging after the vaccine virus strains are selected. The effect is observed for both influenza A and B strains in groups of subjects vaccinated in three different seasons. Analyses include stratification by age and sex.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, ViralAntibody FormationFemaleHemagglutination Inhibition TestsHumansInfluenza A virusInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMaleSeasonsVaccinationYoung AdultAntibodies, ViralInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID28701762
PMCPMC5507920
OpenAlexW2733258917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.