Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28701557›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2017

The physical boundaries of public goods cooperation between surface-attached bacterial cells.

Michael Weigert, Rolf Kümmerli

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Iron acquisition strategies in pseudomonads: mechanisms, ecology, and evolution.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Single-Cell Imaging Reveals ThatFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Individual- versus group-optimality in the production of secreted bacterial compounds.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2019
    Article
  20. Pyoverdine-Dependent Virulence ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Michael WeigertDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland michael_weigert@gmx.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8974-0854
Rolf KümmerliDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland rolf.kuemmerli@uzh.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4084-6679
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

European Research Council 681295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria secrete a variety of compounds important for nutrient scavenging, competition mediation and infection establishment. While there is a general consensus that secreted compounds can be shared and therefore have social consequences for the bacterial collective, we know little about the physical limits of such bacterial social interactions. Here, we address this issue by studying the sharing of iron-scavenging siderophores between surface-attached microcolonies of the bacterium

Indexed as

Biological TransportOligopeptidesPseudomonas aeruginosaSiderophoresOligopeptidespyoverdinSiderophoresbacterial social interactionsmolecule diffusionPseudomonas aeruginosasiderophoressingle-cell behaviour

Identifiers

PMID28701557
PMCPMC5524494
OpenAlexW2949251377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.