Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28701503›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2017

Taking chances and making mistakes: non-genetic phenotypic heterogeneity and its consequences for surviving in dynamic environments.

Coco van Boxtel, Johan H van Heerden, Niclas Nordholt, Phillipp Schmidt, Frank J Bruggeman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Theoretical and computational tools to model multistable gene regulatory networks.Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain) · 2023
    Review
  9. Royal Society open science · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Journal of biosciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Memory shapes microbial populations.PLoS computational biology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Coco van BoxtelSystems Bioinformatics, Amsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines and Systems (AIMMS), VU Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johan H van HeerdenSystems Bioinformatics, Amsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines and Systems (AIMMS), VU Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Niclas NordholtSystems Bioinformatics, Amsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines and Systems (AIMMS), VU Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Phillipp SchmidtSystems Bioinformatics, Amsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines and Systems (AIMMS), VU Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frank J BruggemanSystems Bioinformatics, Amsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines and Systems (AIMMS), VU Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands f.j.bruggeman@vu.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-0255-4766

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural selection has shaped the strategies for survival and growth of microorganisms. The success of microorganisms depends not only on slow evolutionary tuning but also on the ability to adapt to unpredictable changes in their environment. In principle, adaptive strategies range from purely deterministic mechanisms to those that exploit the randomness intrinsic to many cellular and molecular processes. Depending on the environment and selective pressures, particular strategies can lie somewhere along this continuum. In recent years, non-genetic cell-to-cell differences have received a lot of attention, not least because of their potential impact on the ability of microbial populations to survive in dynamic environments. Using several examples, we describe the origins of spontaneous and induced mechanisms of phenotypic adaptation. We identify some of the commonalities of these examples and consider the potential role of chance and constraints in microbial phenotypic adaptation.

Indexed as

EcosystemEpigenesis, GeneticSelection, GeneticAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsPhenotypebet-hedgingnatural selectionnutrient transitionsphenotypic adaptationphenotypic diversification

Identifiers

PMID28701503
PMCPMC5550968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.