Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28701165›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2017

Ethnomedicinal and cultural practices of mammals and birds in the vicinity of river Chenab, Punjab-Pakistan.

Muhammad Altaf, Arshad Javid, Muhammad Umair, Khalid Javed Iqbal, Zahid Rasheed, Arshad Mehmood Abbasi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Folk taxonomy and indigenous names for frogs in Zululand, South Africa.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Muhammad AltafDepartment of Zoology, Women University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Bagh, Pakistan. altaf_mughal450@yahoo.com.
Arshad JavidDepartment of Wildlife and Ecology, University of the Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad UmairSchool of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Khalid Javed IqbalDepartment of Life Sciences, Islamia University Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Zahid RasheedDepartment of Mathematics, Women University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Bagh, Pakistan.
Arshad Mehmood AbbasiDepartment of Environment Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Abbottabad, Pakistan. arshad799@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9978-3866
University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir · PKCOMSATS University Islamabad · PKIslamia University of Bahawalpur · PKShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNUniversity of Veterinary and Animal Sciences · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough, use of animal species in disease treatment and culture practices is as ancient as that of plant species; however ethnomedicinal uses and cultural values of animal species have rarely been reported. Present study is the first report on the medicinal uses of mammals and bird species in Pakistan.

methodsQuestionnaires and semi-structured interviews were applied to collect qualitative and quantitative data from local informants (N = 109). Relative frequency of mention (RFM), fidelity level (FL), relative popularity level (RPL), similarity index (SI) and rank order priority (ROP) indices were used to analyzed the data.

resultsOne hundred and eight species of animals, which include: 83% birds and 17% mammals were documented. In total 30 mammalian and 28 birds' species were used to treat various diseases such as rheumatic disorders, skin infections and sexual weakness among several others. Fats, flesh, blood, milk and eggs were the most commonly utilized body parts. Bos taurus, Bubalus bubalis, Capra aegagrus hircus, Felis domesticus, Lepus nigricollis dayanus and Ovis aries (mammals) and Anas platyrhynchos domesticus, Columba livia, Coturnix coturnix, Gallus gallus and Passer domesticus (birds) were the highly utilized species. Medicinal and cultural uses of 30% mammals and 46% birds were reported for the first time, whereas 33% mammals and 79% birds depicted zero similarity with previous reports.

conclusionPresent study exhibits significant ethnozoological knowledge of local inhabitants and their strong association with animal species, which could be helpful in sustainable use of biodiversity of the region. Additionally, in vitro and in vivo evaluation of biological activities in the mammalian and birds' species with maximum fidelity level and frequency of mention could be important to discover animal based novel drugs. Some commonly used mammals and birds species of the study area.

Indexed as

BirdsMammalsAdultAgedAnimalsCultureEthnicityFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMedicine, TraditionalMiddle AgedPakistanSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultEthnomedicinal uses, Mammals, Birds, Cultural significance, Pakistan

Identifiers

PMID28701165
PMCPMC5508792
OpenAlexW2734611071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.